|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
I have an "impedance" question about how these guys handle things, I'm thinking about doing something that could do something to my 500watt glass D amp, on paper, the idea seems okay, but I just wanted to double check.
Lets first start off that I get my information from this site: Series Parallel Speaker Impedance If I have 4ohm amp. its 500watts. I want to hook up 6x 100watt speakers to it (under power the "tweeters actually" by a little bit) If setup series+parallel setup with 4x 8ohm speakers, to give me a 8ohm load, as seen in this picture: http://www.bcae1.com/images/gifs/spk4sp4.gif (4x4ohm speakers=4ohm load **In the picture** I must assume 8x8ohm speakers=8ohm load **What I'm actually doing**) Now if 8ohms won't work and I NEED it to be 4ohms... ~Question:~ Can I reduce it from 8ohms to 4ohms, **WITH** the above (series+parallel) by using an additional parallel configuration as seen in this picture? http://www.bcae1.com/images/gifs/impspkpr.gif So if the math would be right, it would be something like: 4x8ohm(series+parallel)=8ohm+2x8ohm(Parallel)=4ohm **~~Real ballz of the question~~** Guess what I'm asking here, is how well D class amps can handle this kind of screwing around with the impedance. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Reykjavík
|
From my uneducated experience with Tripath amps, they're quite ignorant of the load attached to them. Class-D is pretty good at handling funny loads. At least w.r.t. overall control and such. Tripaths high frequency response are affected by load impedance, you might have issues, but there are topologies such as UcD that are simply unaffected in that respect.
I'd give it a go. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Quote:
Heres a picture of what I'm planning on doing: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...n/speakers.jpg I'm unsure as to if I should just hook up both the 2 xtras directly to the other 4, or from the amp itself, or if it even matters. Also wondering if i should be then connecting them with eachother, or each taking their own line from the amp itself (or the next speaker from the 4) Basicly wondering if I should use the first red/black to hook up the 5th speaker after the 4, then should I hookup the last 6th speaker with the green lines that are red/black from the 5the speaker? or should I also take it from the amp or the 4th speaker? Just don't want to wire this wrong and loose out on a brand new amp. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speaker Configuration | Havenwood | Multi-Way | 7 | 1st April 2009 02:26 PM |
| combining different speaker wires (weird external crossover problem) | Ang | Everything Else | 2 | 19th January 2007 08:55 PM |
| Is a bridge / parallel configuration of 3875 is better for my speaker ? | 100db | Chip Amps | 7 | 8th March 2006 10:42 AM |
| Weird thyristor configuration | Nixie | Parts | 4 | 7th February 2006 06:29 AM |
| Bipolar speaker configuration ... need info! accoustical pros and cons ? | JinMTVT | Multi-Way | 36 | 30th July 2004 05:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |