|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Hi all
I am examining any possible usefullness of a switched capacitor integrator stage within the global feedback loop of a class D amplifier. My hopes and purpose of using something like that is to kill the rippl aliasing between an amplified error signal and the carrier, which causes distortion and cannot be eaily corrected by simply more feedback. I assume the circuit works a a sample and hold one, so that it resets and holds the value during the whole (or a half) cycle of a clock, hopefully killing the aliasing while providing lots of LF gain, I wish so anyway. Anyone with some experience here? Open for suggestion.. Adam |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warsaw
|
Usually I don't enjoy talking to myself, however I'll continue here anyway.
For what I examined the ripple aliasing is a source of distortion because modulator is a 'sample' system and the sampling takes place in a not-well-defined phase of an error-amplified ripple. Being able to 'hold' after a 'sample' operation (in a switched cap integrator or a similar s&h switched cap circuit) could integrate the ripple during a whole cycle and reset at the beginning of a next cycle. Now, the big question is: how to determine the correct phase of sampling and correct phase of holding the error value, so that the whole stuff really does decrease distortion? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
The phase shift or delay throught the switched capacitor network might cause problems.
I have a class d amp with loads of carrier on the output and it sounds fine. Maybe your just being too fussy and trying to fix what the ear cant hear ?
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: YES
|
Is your amp a clocked or self-clocked (ucd) design?
[backup question: how's the weather in Warsaw? ]
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows --Bob Dylan |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Because he is talking of ripple aliasing I guess it is clocked.
For a switched capacitor integrator to actually work as such it is important that the Nyquist theorem is fulfilled. I.e. it would have to be clocked at several MHz. If not it isn't a switched capacitor integrator but some form of S&H. Which may or may not be helpful - analysis of this is not for the faint at heart. There is a paper by Lars Risbo on loops that are minimising the ripple-aliasing effect. It can be found for free on the web. The principles are also used within the latest high-powered class-d ICs of TI. Another variant would be the use of the so called-node transition filters. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
The Risbo papers and may be also Cox&Candy are always a good starting point.
But unfortunately all papers that I found regarding the modulator errors focus more on the mathematical description of the issue instead of solutions. (Well Cox&Candy even show ideas, but base on pre filter feedback.) Assuming a clocked system with triangle modulator, you may simply step into simulation with the two most simple and IMHO most natural approaches. a) - Handle integration in separate from S&H. ( ==> allowing for independent parametrisation) - Sample at pos and neg peak of triangle, or equivalent at each edge of the clock that syncs the triangle (==> sampling frequency = 2 switching frequency and symmetric lead/lag error on pos and neg half wave) b) - Again handle integration in separate from S&H. ( ==> allowing independent parametrisation) - Sample at the moments of each edge of the output stage In any case for first simulations I would use an ideal switching stage. Sorry for not providing a bullet proof math model. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Switched Capacitor Impedance Converter | smoking-amp | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 31st January 2008 07:51 PM |
| External switched capacitor integrator (clear saa7323 datasheet needed) | ash_dac | Digital Source | 6 | 7th May 2006 11:21 PM |
| signal integrator | matjans | Chip Amps | 2 | 11th February 2004 12:05 PM |
| Switched capacitor filters | Petervg | Solid State | 21 | 18th August 2002 09:45 PM |
| help me.any information about MF10 switched capacitor filter | 7up | Digital Source | 1 | 24th April 2002 01:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09571 seconds (76.63% PHP - 23.37% MySQL) with 10 queries |