|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
Let's see if your future measurement methods will bring some evidence.
Up to now I am slightly frustrated by the lack of coherence between your statements and measurements. |
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
|
Quote:
Apart from that my time is unfortunately fragmented. I already posted the difference between input signal and output amplifier. certainly agree that it takes other measures. especially the last to draw conclusions. You agree that there is the possibility that many amps in the market have good audio measurements standards and the result is bad when you listen to? or all are good? Although there is no doubt that something determines the realism of the sound, the first is the psu. it is not easy to prove. it is obvious that new measurement parameters are being born. or send you an amp and you listen and find ways to make the article, can be a good idea. all that I could keep it to myself, instead of informing the other. ... yes, many do not love me, but many are correcting their amps and are thinking about how to implement the new psu. ![]() Regarding the increased SPL (and more heat on the coil), the study in collaboration with the CNR and the University of California is ready(related on concept only). doc and a lot of pic. and obviously you need a format (create article) to put on the thread. This takes a long time that I did not. My time is made up of 30 min 1 hour segmented. Patience...or collaboration. not have other way on this. P.S. this research on the coherence of the slew rate, has brought to light other things. e.g. DAC with resamples produces many errors independent of the frequency of resampling. The reason is, do not use the sync with the source. then, other interpolation false. This also confirms that a CD can have a good sound (when direct). Regards Last edited by AP2; 6th December 2011 at 01:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: YES
|
AP2, remember my offer for collaboration. May I suggest that you first write your article in Italian, taking all the time you need to make it coherent eg with hypothesis, thesis and all the proofs as you want, then I can translate it into English, and send it back to you.
Cheers, E
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows --Bob Dylan |
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
|
Quote:
well, this weekend send you some doc via email. First, just for ultimate this thread (part-1). " effect of coherence time error" Regards |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Italy
|
For now I put this pic, which plays a simple snare (with springs). the signal is displayed in the sustain phase.
waiting for the comparative measurements between fast and slow amplifier (13uS) who prove conclusively the error. reflection: the vibrations of the springs are modulated in the "unbalanced" offset area. Therefore, the amp continues to modulate the power without going through the crossing point (reset time). An example (just simple one) that helps to understand: Many AB amplifiers have a classic 100-220nF capacitors between the up side and low side in the area of the bias control. (ripple rejection) is simple to adjust this capacitor in the report of thd, or (thd Vs. frequency). (helps lower) seems to work just because we measure periodic signals with a perfectly balanced sinosuidal, (the amp regularly passes by the cross point). But I bet few people know that this capacitor, creates a lot of hysteresis, when the amplifier, modulate the current (need very fast), while it remains in the unbalanced area. (then,modify angle of peak) This is why you need a new measure to determine the result of an amplifier, proposing the "condition" of real work. A very fast ,professional AB, not adjust measure with this capacitors. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 6bx7gt envelope temperature | coyotesgator | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 11th December 2007 11:48 PM |
| Sound card calibration part II - Variable latency anyone? | NIC1138 | Digital Source | 0 | 6th June 2007 10:29 PM |
| Why do some Bogan amps sound so good as guitar amps? | amperex | Instruments and Amps | 7 | 22nd June 2006 11:46 AM |
| JP2.0 Project Part 3 A.K.A PR170s sound amazing.. And a few questions! | DIY_newbie | Multi-Way | 14 | 8th April 2005 06:55 PM |
| Gain/phase relationship of amps? | Beggar | Chip Amps | 2 | 11th September 2003 08:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09334 seconds (76.38% PHP - 23.62% MySQL) with 11 queries |