Hypex Ncore

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to the present datas should be something like this
(for the 680 ohm Rg, +4db input stage gain)
 

Attachments

  • NC400 gain.jpg
    NC400 gain.jpg
    83.7 KB · Views: 936
Hi,

Quick question. Can someone point me toward the connector for J1 on the SMPS? I have looked for item # JST-B7B-EHA on Digikey, with no luck. This looks like it, but not the correct item #. I seem to have thrown out the ones that came with my units and need them now.

Thank you

Digi-Key Part Number
455-1005-ND - Housing.
455-1042-1-ND Crimp
 
While we are at it, would someone know the exact reference of the female crimp terminal to use with the microfit molex connector 43025-1200 ?
I think it is the 43030, but several version exists:
View List

What is the AWG of the wire?

I would like to fit 2 (or myabe even 3) wires per connector, so if the original AWG is 24, 2 of them should fit no problem in the 20-24 AWG model...

Also, do you know if special tools are required to assembled those crimps, or will a simple crimp tool be sufficient?
 
My 3 monoblocks with bridged nc400 and SMPS1200A400, built by my friend Georg.

We have compared them against the standard nc400+SMPS600 in a dual-mono config today. The bridged ones sounds much more "alive", and they are not even broken in. The standard ones sounds flatter. Less dynamics.

The monoblocks has version 4 of nc400. The dual-mono has version 3. What was the changes made in version 4?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_1537.jpg
    DSC_1537.jpg
    91.2 KB · Views: 669
  • DSC_1550.jpg
    DSC_1550.jpg
    267.7 KB · Views: 658
  • DSC_1551.jpg
    DSC_1551.jpg
    171.7 KB · Views: 834
  • DSC_1552.jpg
    DSC_1552.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 624
My 3 monoblocks with bridged nc400 and SMPS1200A400, built by my friend Georg.

We have compared them against the standard nc400+SMPS600 in a dual-mono config today. The bridged ones sounds much more "alive", and they are not even broken in. The standard ones sounds flatter. Less dynamics.

The monoblocks has version 4 of nc400. The dual-mono has version 3. What was the changes made in version 4?

I am missing the cap across the output terminals!
 
I have had them running all night today playing low volume. The cases are very hot. I can hold my hand on them without pain, but it is hotter than anything I have had before.
I will check if Hifi2000 sells more ventilated top covers to this case (Galaxy Maggiorato with aluminium top/bottom)
The internal regulators are working in the nc400 because I do not have the smps600. So they are dissipating more heat than the in normal case.
Without the top cover it was not running hot at all.
Any other advice what I can/should do? I know theat many class-A amplifiers are running very hot, maybe it is ok?
 
Rajapruk,

Interesting observations on the bridging.

Regarding the heat, then how about making a small VDR supply. You shouldn´t need more than a small 12 to 15 VAC coil, a bridge and a small cap say 2200uF. Then use the negative HV supply as reference and you should have the 17-21 VDC you need for the VDR. It should save you half the heat dissipation form the modules and maybe that could also bring other improvements too :)

Best,
 
strange.. I had my ncore at a DIY gathering last WE, and even at elevated music levels the cabinets were lukewarm at most. (standard aluminium Hifi 2000 slimline cabinets, ncores just mounted on the bottom)

Henkjan,

I think the point here is that the external VDR is not used which roughly doubles the standby heat dissipation of the ncore modules. Playing music loud or not makes close to no difference as you have very good efficiency (probably > 90%) when neglecting the standby consumption hereunder the internal VDR (5W per module).

I don´t think the bridge configuration should make any noticeable difference on the heat dissipation form class D amps although it usually do on other classes of operation...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.