|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
|
I haven't followed D-amps for a couple of years, but quick browsing of manufacturer datasheets and this forum leads me to believe that even with feedback, D-amps are still much worse than average class AB amps, i.e. a good D-amp will have roughly 0.02 % or - 74 dB THD+N, no matter whether analog input or digital. If I have overlooked any designs that perform significantly better, I'd be glad for a pointer.
Datasheets will ususally give THD+D vs. power and sometimes vs. frequency, but I am not aware of any FFT data with a sine input. Again, I'd be glad for any pointers. The best thing I found was the TAS5630 data sheet that shows about 0.02% THD+N over much of the operating range. It gives an FFT of the noise floor, which seems to sit at about - 135 dB. This would imply that THD+N is dominated by HD, contrary to what I expected. Comments? Thanks |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Reykjavík
|
I am not an engineer, but I want to point out that 41Hz's implementations of Tripath TK2050 and TA3020 amps have been measured with 0.007-0.008% THD+N:
41Hz Amp4 41Hz Amp15 Amp15-PS measurements When the Amp15-PS BBM timing was lowered from 80nS to 40nS, "the THD+N at 1KHz went down from around 0.008% to around 0.005%." (source). This heats up the output FETs a great deal, to the point of blowing them up in some cases, so that the 0.005% THD+N distortion figure may not be realistically attainable in all configurations. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
|
Thanks. Especially the last link with the measurements was very helpful. While it shows that the noise floor is excellent, it seems to indicate that THD+N is mostly defined by a -80 dB second harmonic (ok, maybe -82 dB if you take into account signal generator noise).
This is a number you would expect from a poorly designed AB amp with high feedback, or a well-designed AB amp with little or no global feedback. Are the distortion mechanisms understood in class D? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all,
This FFT is also an excellent outcome reported to an amplifier in class D.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Reykjavík
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Reykjavík
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
yes, this is not very good for audiophile performances but... see full spectrum please. this is a good commercial audio amplifier class D,300-400w(4R) with PSU on board. you can see FFT at 1KHz from annother amplifier, spectrum is full of harmonics. very clean output has to work very hard. many harmonics affecting the upper audio frequencies to listen, the voice is as shrill. I not see clean FFT of others Amp, as the A-B class.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Helsingborg, southern sweden
|
capslock
There are two basic families of class d. Clocked and self oscillating. Clocked versions have a theoretical loop gain that is constant vs output power (given that the power supply is firm) which makes THD fall all the way to clipping similarly to a class B amp. The big problem is that their loop gain is low giving a high THD to start with. Adding integrating loops around a clocked amp gives a big increase in high order harmonics unless the fsw and harmonics are filtered out of the fed back signal. Self oscillating amps have a much higher loop gain at low output powers but the loop gain falls as output signal is increased (due to dropping fsw) giving a rising THD at higher powers. It is somewhat easier to add integrating loops to a self oscillating amp but one has to make sure that the amp does not start switching at the resonance frequency of the output filter. There are of course many more factors arising from the practical implementations. One can achieve good audio performance with both clocked and self oscillating amps but it is much more complicated and expensive to do it with a clocked amp.
__________________
If something that measures good doesn´t sound good, measure again! |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultra low noise amp with JFET's - How to reduce the THD ?? | toogool | Solid State | 9 | 21st May 2010 09:54 AM |
| What causes high THD in tube amps ? | Borat | Tubes / Valves | 77 | 1st September 2009 11:45 PM |
| 0.0004% THD Class D Module | Lars Clausen | Class D | 16 | 13th November 2005 02:15 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |