|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
ok, I think I'm starting to get the hang of this. I've managed to put together a second order loop which is slow and pretty temperamental with regards to changing components - especially the caps and resisters controlling the integrators, but its progress nevertheless
![]() here's the schematic ![]() and here's the output ![]() The next step is to fiddle with component values and opamps/comparators to get a sense of which bits affect what, the goal being to make it a little more stable and of course faster, any suggestions as to where to start? oh and one other thing, I've read that opamp integrators cant be used in loops above second order, so I suppose i really have two questions. First how would you implement an integrator without an opamp? (i'm guessing it'd be some kind of rc filter) and second is it worthwhile for a guitar amp that is likely to have distortion dialled in, one way or another regardless? cheers, Isaac |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
I would start by removing the error:
Using just one feedback resistor for both integrators (i.e. R6) doesn't work. Both need an own feedback resistor ! Play a little with them first (and also the caps). We will show you how to determine a noise transfer function later on. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Sure, like this?
![]() actually looking at it now, i can see it why it should be there, so thankyou for preventing future headaches (or am i wrong - should it be in series with R6?)noise transfer function sound interesting, I look forward to it. until then I'll keep fiddeling, still having trouble getting the speed up, but it seems like a much smaller problem problem compared to where I was two days ago ![]() thanks again, Isaac |
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
As far as sigma delta modulation is concerned, it is better to go for higher order loops to increase the randomness of the quantizer. It is always easy and reliable (stability-wise) to extract the coefficients from the Richard-Shreier's toolbox(MATLAB). Quote:
2) could you rephrase please. |
||
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
RC circuit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia I realise now that would only work with a single time constant - not a varying signal - Fourier analysis never was my strong point .again I blame tiredness :P my question was, is it worth going to all this trouble to reduce distortion and noise for a guitar amp that is going to have at least a little distortion added intentionally? I haven't had an opportunity to listen to the kind of distortion produced by a low order delta sigma loop, so I don't really know how it sounds. thank you everyone for your patience I'm trying to learn all this as I go. Isaac |
||
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Just did another simulation, up to third order now, using opamp integrators so in conclusion Terminator12, your right and I'm wrong as to be expected
![]() anyway here's the schematic: ![]() and the output: ![]() if your wondering about why its such a small voltage, its because its taken through a high impedance tap from the output of the flip-flop to avoid effecting the circuit. Looks nice and clean though
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Isaacp, what is the reason behind putting those comparators in-between the integrators? I think it would work better without them. Do you have any concrete reason behind using them?
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why delta sigma class D | terminator12 | Class D | 7 | 6th May 2010 06:20 AM |
| Does a delta sigma modulator need an output filter? | kipman725 | Class D | 6 | 18th January 2010 11:04 PM |
| Sigma Delta Bandwidth | d1983 | Class D | 1 | 14th November 2007 02:17 AM |
| Delta-Sigma Class D | contitek | Class D | 16 | 10th March 2005 12:10 PM |
| which clock used in delta-sigma modulator for cs43122? | rlim | Digital Source | 1 | 16th July 2004 08:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10904 seconds (79.30% PHP - 20.70% MySQL) with 11 queries |