|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Good afternoon all,
I am looking for a proven design, if only for the sake of interest, for a high-powered class D subwoofer amplifier. The general requirements would be: - In the range of 750 to 1000 watts peak output power - Stable with a 2 ohm load impedance ideally (4 ohms or less would be nice) - For frequency response, a -3 dB lower knee of 10 to 15 Hz For the purpose of this discussion, I will omit power supply requirements. Do any of you know of such a proven design? If not, would there be interest in a collaborative design of sorts? I am new to class D, and as such have no experience to offer. However, I have a background in electronics, and might be able to propose enough silly ideas to keep things interesting! Jim |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Good evening,
It would seem such a design is rare. Would there be value in working together, on an open-source design for such an application? Just for fun, here are some (newbie!) thoughts. The design goals: - low frequency extension (down to 15 Hz @ -3 dB would be nice) - able to drive low impedance loads (4 ohms or less) - high power output (750 W peak or greater into 4 ohms within usable BW) - modest parts count if possible - reasonable cost - reliable Compromises: - THD (within reason, distortion content is not as important) - physical size (groups of output devices, for example) - efficiency if need be (current sharing resistors added if needed, for example) *** Just to get the ball rolling, here is a rough draft of the building blocks. IRS2092 looks like a nice front end chip. My first thought is to mate it with a gate driver IC, namely IRS2011. IRS2092 appears (from the reference design) to be intended for half-bridge use. This brings us to the first of my newbie questions: could I use it in a full-bridge design, using multiple gate drivers? Also, if I wanted to use additional output devices, can I simply add gate drivers? I would imagine PCB trace length may become an issue in order to maintain synchronous switching, but that is getting ahead of things. More to come, it's late for now! :P Jim Last edited by J.R.Freeman; 7th May 2010 at 02:06 AM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Quebec
|
Where are you located? Montreal?
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
SINEWAVE ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Excellent works!I think self osc topic is not good choose,we have developed one module use discrete parts like JBL EON518S or EON515 active modules,(JBL :: Product) but we not use it at 10Hz low frequency,we cut off 40Hz low frequency due to woofer can't works and out of hearing.fixed frequency class D should good choose and usually use full bridge and low voltage added when 2ohm load, If you like you can connect us ,our mail:authlxl@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
Jim |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
Thank you for your comments. Hmm, that's interesting: so that circuit has a descrete PWM front end and a high-voltage gate-driver IC? An interesting design, but for heavy-duty, long-term use I wonder how such a few number of output devices would fare. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Hey again all,
Here is a quick drawing I made to go along with some questions, concerning the IRS2092 IC. Could you do something like the following to use the IRS2092 in a full-bridge design? If VB and VCC were supplied with low (TTL) level voltages, could HO and LO be used to drive dedicated gate driver IC's in this way? My goal here is to drive multiple pairs of output fets, with each pair having its own driver. My guess is that the bootstrap circuitry will not be manipulated like this. Any thoughts? (be gentle, I'm new!) ![]() edit: this drawing is intentionally simplified for the purposes of this discussion! Jim
Last edited by J.R.Freeman; 11th May 2010 at 05:19 AM. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Hey again all,
I may have killed the conversation by considering too many things at once. Here is a question then, that perhaps someone with experience might be able to help me with: Assuming I'd like to go with a full-bridge design, is the IRS2092 a good choice as the front-end? While considering this question, I have been thinking a bit about the basic circuit structure of such a design. One method of implementing a full-bridge makes use of 2 IRS2092 IC's, driven with a differential signal, generated by inverting the incoming audio signal to 1 of the IC's, with each IC running in half-bridge mode. Is this the preferred method? Would it be possible to use a single IRS2092, and a gate-drive-buffer section to drive all 4 fet groups? Any and all comments are appreciated. This past weekend I managed to get a free schematic layout / PCB package up and running at home, so I will start to post some schematics as things progress. Jim |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Power P3A design questions. | bigparsnip | Solid State | 121 | 23rd April 2012 05:06 PM |
| High power SMPS design. | Jim McPherson | Power Supplies | 15 | 1st May 2009 07:46 AM |
| Starting a High Power Design. . . | swagboy | Solid State | 74 | 3rd June 2006 02:28 PM |
| High Power design | dunderchief | Car Audio | 10 | 17th September 2003 05:28 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11182 seconds (90.09% PHP - 9.91% MySQL) with 10 queries |