Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th March 2010, 03:06 PM   #191
vogor is offline vogor  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
vogor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Irkutsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
Yes, I have seen oscillating 78XX very often. They can even heat from such reason, when there is nothing connected to the output!

For my startup/shutdown schematic is important, that the driver vcc will fall down AFTER the main power supply. Disconnecting the fans from your 18V supply would provide this effect easily.
Ok, I will continue experiments later.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 03:08 PM   #192
vogor is offline vogor  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
vogor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Irkutsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
are you sure, that the amp was started in this case? you wrote, that it was needed to give some small input signal, before it starts to work
I have reduced 200K the resistor to 100K now with it everything is all right
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 03:11 PM   #193
81bas is offline 81bas  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
Quote:
Originally Posted by vogor View Post
I have reduced 200K the resistor to 100K now with it everything is all right
Then why you needed the startup/shutdown circuit at all? Only because of small PUP at shutdown??
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 03:32 PM   #194
vogor is offline vogor  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
vogor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Irkutsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
Then why you needed the startup/shutdown circuit at all? Only because of small PUP at shutdown??
Yes, I wish to eliminate this PUP at shutdown, then still protection and a limiter will need to be added
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 03:32 PM   #195
81bas is offline 81bas  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
Quote:
Originally Posted by vogor View Post
I have reduced 200K the resistor to 100K now with it everything is all right
Also, did you used the Zener diode parallel to C13? With 100K resistor at driver idle there can be produced too high voltage also!

Also, I think I understand the reason of this failure... In my startup/shutdown schematic I have seen in simulations, that the 100uf cap will charge to 15V in 2-3 seconds via 100K resistor (providing SD delay) with 65V rails, and if you connected my startup/shutdown circuit, then it has produced the startup delay, and your 47uf C13 cap have charged via 100k resistor in 2-3 seconds to about 30 Volts!!! (at idle the driver consumes very small current) Sure it has killed your upper mosfet after startup! And I have recommended you to use the Zener diode parallel to C13 already in previous posts!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 03:46 PM   #196
81bas is offline 81bas  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
Then why you needed the startup/shutdown circuit at all? Only because of small PUP at shutdown??
LOL! I have seen in IR2110 datasheet now, that after active SD, the high and low side will be NOT reenabled, if the HIN or LIN is active So delaying the SD signal at startup will not help to start amp oscillation! (have AP2 said about it already?)
Also, connecting the 100K resistor between +65V and the amp OUTPUT will help to start oscillation in the same way, as connecting this resistor to Vb! It works because 100K resistor produces POSITIVE DC offset at output during startup (via charging C13 or directly) and the input integrator needs to initiate the oscillation with NEGATIVE pulse

Shame on me, that I did not realised it previously

Last edited by 81bas; 18th March 2010 at 03:51 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 04:04 PM   #197
vogor is offline vogor  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
vogor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Irkutsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
LOL!...
Shame on me, that I did not realised it previously
Yes, similar top mosfet has burnt down for this reason, zener in parallel с13 could rescue the scheme... So what your general result taking into account result of my last experience? your scheme of deenergizing will work if to use the separate rectifier for 7812?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 04:19 PM   #198
81bas is offline 81bas  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
Quote:
Originally Posted by vogor View Post
Yes, similar top mosfet has burnt down for this reason, zener in parallel с13 could rescue the scheme... So what your general result taking into account result of my last experience? your scheme of deenergizing will work if to use the separate rectifier for 7812?
yes, this will work! The startup delay seems to be useless, but since you have implemented this already, it will not interfere.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 04:31 PM   #199
vogor is offline vogor  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
vogor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Irkutsk
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81bas View Post
yes, this will work! The startup delay seems to be useless, but since you have implemented this already, it will not interfere.
One more moment, what elements in your scheme are responsible for operation and occurrence SD border, at amplifier "PUP" deenergizing appeared almost at once, I think it is necessary to raise a threshold to 55V, what it is necessary to change for this purpose?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2010, 04:54 PM   #200
81bas is offline 81bas  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kiel
Quote:
Originally Posted by vogor View Post
One more moment, what elements in your scheme are responsible for operation and occurrence SD border, at amplifier "PUP" deenergizing appeared almost at once, I think it is necessary to raise a threshold to 55V, what it is necessary to change for this purpose?
It is needed to play on R4 and R2. But 35-40V threshold is OK too, I think...
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My first class A amplifier meanman1964 Pass Labs 42 15th February 2008 07:32 AM
Class D Vs Class I (Balanced Current Amplifier) rmsaudio Class D 28 29th September 2006 07:03 AM
Selfoscillating HalfBridge 500W+500W by IR. Interested? deflorator Class D 0 10th October 2004 03:30 PM
Questions about how to decrease the PASS A-40 amplifier into a class AB amplifier. novtango Pass Labs 2 21st October 2002 01:50 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:54 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio