|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
maximum delay is 1ms = 1000us per chanel.
Reinhard |
|
|
|
#82 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Finland
|
Yes of course! Thank you for the correction.
Actually the lack of delay for the sub channel is a big drawback for me. I would like to set up a system with a single sub between the front speakers. The initial plan was to use a single AS2.100 plus a separate UcD400 amp to do the amplification for the sub. But with the speakers along the front wall the sub channel would have to be delayed ~2ms. I could use two modules and a dual voicecoil sub but even then 1ms=34cm may not be enough delay to play with.
__________________
-thomas s |
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Finland
|
Quote:
I'm now concidering to use another AS2.100 for the sub to get delay. But even then I fear that 1ms may not be enough as the sub would be 50-60cm closer to the listening position than the main speakers.
__________________
-thomas s |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Philadelphia
|
Quick question
Is there a US version? The manual specifies 230v for use in Europe, and the web shop does not indicate a version for 115v for use in the US. Thanks, Duc |
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
Jan-Peter |
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
How does the upcoming "High End" version differ from the AS2.100, performance-wise, disregarding features?
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
#88 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
I do realise that it is a different configuration. What I'm trying to understand is what performance gains will be had from doing this, that differentiates it as being high end? Or, to put it conversely, what precludes the current design from being labelled high end? Is it a question of performance or style?
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht |||||||||| DON'T PANIC |||||||||| |
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
Jan-Peter |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS : Hypex ST PSU | korben69 | Swap Meet | 1 | 2nd July 2010 11:46 AM |
| Question for those who have tried hypex smps with hypex modules | avian | Class D | 12 | 3rd March 2009 09:30 AM |
| Hypex UcD 400. | ian walker | Swap Meet | 3 | 14th January 2008 03:32 PM |
| Hypex UcD 180AD + signal wires, Power Supply ST, Hypex Transformer TR100A | c10h12n2 | Swap Meet | 7 | 7th July 2007 03:55 PM |
| FS: Hypex UcD 400/180AD, hypex toroid | Archmage | Swap Meet | 4 | 14th November 2006 04:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |