|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
|
I have been looking at the TI part TAS5142 its a switching block for a digital amp chain.
Has anyone already tried placing a comparator on the front for a compact UCD, cos it looks like its begging for a try! http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folder...t/tas5142.html regards
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE -I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge- |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
I've not tried this part, but I did try an earlier, higher power part, the TAS5261. That part had internal circuitry that tri-stated the output FETs if there was no switching activity for a certain time. The effect was that if you had a UCD implementation using it that was driven into clipping on a 1kHz sine wave (say), then the output stage would switch off, requiring external circuitry to reset it to start it up again. (as I'm sure you know, a UCD amp will stop oscillating during the clipped part of the waveform).
This part doesn't seem to have that internal function, so it may well work well. No good for commercial use though, as using it would be outside the Philips/NXP constraints regarding licence-free use of the patented UCD technique. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
|
There is a note in the text saying about modulation depth over 96% preventing the bootstrap cap charging, causing failure of the upper fet; so this may be a problem
as for the Phillips NXP patent see post http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...34#post1271334 and given the time it took for me to get a reply from Nick Koper I think they have given up! regards
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE -I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge- |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
The data sheet only shows a 33nF cap for bootstrap, which may well discharge during clipping in a UCD implementation. It looks as if a larger value cap could be fitted, if the internal diodes will stand the pulse current through them.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
|
it should be no problem to place a uf4002 between the cap and the GVCC and spare the internal diode its blushes!
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE -I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge- |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The only reason that I can see for such low bootstrap capacitor values is cost reduction.
The usual fluctuations in bootstrap capacitor voltage that arise when the output approaches the rails and duty cycle changes result in fluctuations in switching times and dead time. This translates into increased THD because bootstrap capacitor voltage usually drops and dead time increases. This can be easily seen on oscilloscope by synchronizing to the input edge and watching the signal dependent jitter on the output edge. Values as high as 47uF are required to reduce this effect to the point that it can no longer be seen.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06752 seconds (83.67% PHP - 16.33% MySQL) with 9 queries |