Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th November 2008, 07:21 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
HAs anyone tried using the HIP4080A; this has the comparator inside, the performance doesn't look to bad (the comparator that is) giving a true single chip amplifier!
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE
-I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge-
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 08:20 AM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
The HIP4080 only has a max peak output current of 2.5A, so it's limited in its output power. It also doesn't have any internal current sensing circuitry.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 08:44 AM   #13
luka is online now luka  Slovenia
diyAudio Member
 
luka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in Slovenia :)
Send a message via MSN to luka
Search, then ask

http://home20.inet.tele.dk/audio/HIP...p4080_soda.htm
__________________
home page @ http://www.classdaudio.co.cc @ 24/7 all year long
I FEEL SLOVENIA
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 08:53 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
Quote:
Originally posted by Ouroboros
The HIP4080 only has a max peak output current of 2.5A, so it's limited in its output power. It also doesn't have any internal current sensing circuitry.

I wasn't suggesting just the IC, I meant using a H bridge of fets from it.
I think I may give this a try as I can butcher one of my VA amplifiers which uses the 4081 and 319 comparators in a class BD solution.
Hmm got me thinking!!
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE
-I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge-
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 09:24 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
It should work well, and you could do a 'UCD style' amp if you wanted as both the + and - inputs of the comparator are accessible.

Pity that's not also the case with the IRS2092. If this had the comparator connected differently internally, then this also could be used for a UCD amp, but as it stands it isn't a great deal of use for this, even though it's ideal for a pre-filter feedback sigma-delta self oscillating design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 09:39 AM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sunderland
I followed Luka's link; the guy opted for external comparator because of noise and "so it starts up silently when dis is removed"- checking the 4080a data sheet the comparator is not affected by the DIS pin so I fear other issues in the layout and decoupling were at the heart of the problems.
Still worth a quick try in UCD like mode- you never know!
__________________
Anthony C Smith MAES MinstSCE
-I think rain is wet so who am I to Judge-
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 02:00 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Cro maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to Cro maniac
It seems that TL3016 I planned to use as modulator doesn't have rail-to-rail input (it is limited to 1,25-3,6V common mode input voltage when powered from 5V), so now I'm searching for another single supply fast differential comparator with r-r input.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 02:09 PM   #18
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
You don't need R-R input common mode. If you arrange your resistor values so that the self-biasing condition (allowing for the fact that the output of the amplifier will sit at an average voltage of Vsupply/2) will be at 2.5V (if your comparator supply voltage is 5V) then the actual signal swing at the input to the comparator will not go anywhere near the rails. The signal swing at the comparator input will be the audio output swing divided by the open-loop gain plus a small amount of the switching waveform. (Open loop gain is of course difficult to quantify in a UCD-style self-oscillating amplifier).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 03:14 PM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Cro maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to Cro maniac
Quote:
The signal swing at the comparator input will be the audio output swing divided by the open-loop gain plus a small amount of the switching waveform.
Isn't the open loop gain in ucd proportional to attenuation of the output filter at switching frequency ?

Can you please explain what you mean ?
I don't understand why would signal at the comparator inputs be audio output swing divided by the open-loop gain. If I power my amp from 60V and set gain of 12 on each side I'll have 2,5V on both inputs of the comparator at idle. But what when output goes near the rails ? Won't I have 5V at one input and 0 at the other ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2008, 05:38 PM   #20
diyAudio Member
 
Ouroboros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
Yes, the open-loop gain is effectively that.

Regarding the swing at the actual input to the comparator. Here it is the O/L gain that matters. Just think of an op-amp. The actual differential swing directly at the op-amp input is the voltage at the op-amp output divided by the O/L gain of the op-amp at that particular frequency. In an op-amp inverter, normally the summing junction is considered as a 'virtual earth'. In reality, there is a signal at this point but it is tiny, and is the output divided by the O/L gain. In a bridged UCD circuit with differential input and differential feedback paths, then a similar state exists regarding the comparator inputs. If you SPICE it you'll see a fairly large component of the switching frequency (resulting from the post-filter ripple, and the NFB path attenuation) but a low component of the audio signal.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reopening an unfinished debate: Dual bridge vs. Single Bridge xiphmont Chip Amps 15 26th February 2008 08:22 PM
Single or dual bridge and why? ßart West-VL. Power Supplies 38 18th February 2008 10:47 PM
referencing heater supply ground to B+ jarthel Tubes / Valves 2 14th March 2007 08:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Page generated in 0.08751 seconds (69.15% PHP - 30.85% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio