|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Hello! I have nothing to say that my English is not good.
I have some small doubts, always caught my attention Class D amplifiers, however, the few diagrams eh found on the Internet that require the IC IR2110, IR2111, and so are my doubts: Is there any alternative to this IC? Will there be a way to make a more simple design with common components? I thank in advance all the help I can give |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A discrete high side driver would be more complex. IR2xxx actually result in simple drive circuits with very low part count.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Every major semiconductor has their own high/low side driver. Like UCC27200 from TI.
If you want to skip these driver IC's, make class D with common source Pch/Nch mosfet, you don't need these drivers. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
There are no high-performance P-channel MOSFET with Vds ratings above 100V, and the ones rated at 100V or less exhibit too high Rds-on and charges/capacitances in comparison with N-channel devices.
You get increased performance and efficiency in return for the complexity of high side drive.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
I'm blowing high/low mosfet driver like popcorn here. They seems so fragile. What's the secret to work with these IC's during development/experiment stage?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
|
I have used IR2110 with success, not even a single failure with mosfet upto 230nC of Qg.
For higher voltage and Qg mosfets, TC4420 + 6N137 is very good
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
I'm not using IRxxxx, but UCC27200. Here's the PCB layout, I have to draw the schematic later.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
And where is the ground plane?
The bootstrap capacitor is by far too small for audio class-D The low-side current sense resistor is in the gate drive loop and in the HB/HS clamping loop You clearly have some good keys for success ![]() I place all my gate driver ICs and modulators in daughter boards and I use continous ground planes. I would never sense the current in that way, too. All this is for good reasons... BTW: My methods may seem crazy, but I've just measured over 94% efficiency on a two-stage 120V 60Hz sinewave inverter at 2000W output. It uses IR2113 and I have not blew a single one during the whole development.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Hi, EVA,
Why is when I blow the output mosfet, the driver always broken too? In experimental stage, how to preserve the UCC27200 whenever the output mosfet is blown away? Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quality of Hammond 300 series power transformers compared to 200 series? | G | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 3rd August 2012 07:32 AM |
| Three 10" 4Ohm subs, wired in series or series-parallel? | Nagamitsu | Car Audio | 24 | 10th May 2009 03:24 AM |
| Delay matching in IR2xxx low and high side gate drivers | Eva | Power Supplies | 8 | 10th June 2007 08:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |