diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Class D (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/class-d/)
-   -   Output filter (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/class-d/108033-output-filter.html)

m-tech 5th September 2007 05:41 PM

Output filter
 
2 Attachment(s)
I built my first class D amp. It's a full bridge, single supply, based on LT1162 bridge driver. It sounds great, but I have some questions about output filter. Currently, my output coils are wounded on separate cores ( core EF25, 1mm air gap ), but I saw that they can be wound on same core.
1. one core is advantage ( smaller PCB, costs... ), but are there some disadvantages ?
2. how to calculate C3, C4, C5 ?

thanks.

m-tech 7th September 2007 04:11 PM

Somebody ?

Keruskerfuerst 7th September 2007 04:27 PM

C3 = 1/2 C2 (C2 from the left picture
C4=C5= 2 * C3 (C3 from the right picture)

m-tech 7th September 2007 05:10 PM

Are you sure ( C4=C5=2*C3=C2 ) ? I saw a few schematics and always is C3>C4.
What about 1st question ?

Baldin 7th September 2007 05:23 PM

First, when the coils are wound on the same core you only need half the windings for each coil, compared to winding on two separate cores.

Second, you don't need C4 and C5. C3 should be half that of C1.

Thirdly, remember that when calculating L1/C1, you should set Rload to half that of the seaker, in your example 4 ohm due to the ballanced mode.

theAnonymous1 7th September 2007 06:26 PM

Maybe this will help......

http://www.murata.com/emc/knowhow/pd...-1/26to28e.pdf

m-tech 8th September 2007 03:47 PM

Thanks for all.

Quote:

Originally posted by Baldin
First, when the coils are wound on the same core you only need half the windings for each coil, compared to winding on two separate cores.

But, this is full bridge amp ( not two halfbridge connected in bridge ). L1 and L2 are connected in series with speaker and calculations told me that I need 60uH ( L1=L2=30uH ). So, if they wounded on same core, L1 and L2 should be 15uH each ? Why ? ( I'm confused now )

Quote:

Originally posted by Baldin
Second, you don't need C4 and C5. C3 should be half that of C1.
What is purpose of C4 and C5 ? As I sad earlier, a saw them on few schematics.

Ouroboros 10th September 2007 09:05 AM

If you only have a cap across the speaker (and not also a cap from each side of the speaker to ground), then any common-mode noise produced by the amp will radiate and give you big EMC problems. It is ALWAYS wise to fit C4, C5 to help filter out common-mode noise. (I've got caught by this myself before).

Believe me, there will be C-M noise at RF produced by the switching!

Baldin 10th September 2007 07:04 PM

This is of course true. I use these my self in my bridged design. These only have to be like 10% of C3 in value. As you say Ouroboros they are ther to reduce commonmode noise, but remember that they will add to the filtering effect.
So if you have C3 = 1uf and C4=C5=100nF then the resulting "C3" will be 1,05uF (stil pretty close to 1uF though :))

Cyguy84 22nd September 2007 07:04 AM

I have a very similar issue, but this forum isn't letting me start a new thread.


So I apologize, I plan on hijacking this thread if it won't let me post it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2