|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Hello everyone. I am building a class T amp for a class project. My instructor has a demo that he built using mostly surface mount resistors and caps. It sounds pretty good, but I am wondering if high quality through-hole components will give me better sound quality? I'm aiming to squeeze all of the fidelity I can out of this little chip.
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
There is a common misconception that through hole parts "sound" better than surface mount parts. There are differences in construction methods and quality between any kind of parts. You can get a good metal film resistor in a surface mount or through hole package that for all audio intents and purposes will perform equally.
The advantage of surface mount components is that they give you more flexibility when routing a PCB. Smaller parts can mean a tighter layout, less parasitics, and better performance at higher frequencies (i.e. class d).
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
SMT offers a very small footprint thus enhances compactness
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Smaller components tend to produce better performance in my experience. One of the larger issues the designer has to deal with is HF EMI induced into the small signal linear stage (front end buffers, etc). Keeping the parts tiny helps to keep loops small and keeps potential antennas small.
The same argument can be made for the power / driver stages; smaller parts keep radiating loops and parasitic inductances small. All of this within the constraints of appropriate power dissipation and voltage ratings of course. A notable exception are the resistors used for feedback. Even Rs have voltage coefficients and SMT Rs have worse performance in this regard. 0402s worse than 0603, etc. Stick with 1206 or 2x1206 to be safe. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
u can get low Distribution of capacitance and inductance , it make ur damp running fine in a hi-speed. but some high power project, u cant find or hard to find a hi-power Component in SMD, so... best rg fumac |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Surface mount components! | ungie | Swap Meet | 12 | 25th September 2009 01:41 PM |
| Surface Mount Packages | cantskienuf | Parts | 0 | 6th November 2008 08:02 PM |
| WTB: AD797 surface mount | len_scanlan | Swap Meet | 1 | 6th March 2008 09:23 PM |
| WT: OPA2604 Surface Mount 2x - Will trade DIP mount 2x | Destroyer OS. | Swap Meet | 1 | 22nd December 2006 06:18 AM |
| Surface mount is more fun than... | PSz. | Chip Amps | 0 | 9th April 2004 10:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10360 seconds (77.93% PHP - 22.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |