|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello!
As everybody knows, the OPA4134 is a pretty expensive Opamp, and the TL074 is very cheap. I was reading de datasheet of the TL074, and I found that it's slew rate is 13v/s, pretty good if you compare to a poor RC4558 that is 1.7v/s... The Opa4134 have a slew rate of 20v/s... Both are J-FET inputs too ! So, I'd like to ask you listeners, the diference between OPA4134 and TL074 is that big, or just a thing that you can barely perceive? I'll not drive any low impedance with the opamps. Best Regards !
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Would be nice to consider the LM837 too !
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
When used in a buffer application I think the TL072 sounds more laid back, perhaps a tad too smooth. The OPA2134 sounds more precise and neutral. Both are good opamps for the price, and I prefer either of them over the NE5532. The difference between them certainly isn't staggering, especially when used at unity gain into a higher impedance load (>1kohm).
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So I'll make it hybrid.
For every buffer, I'll use TL074, and for every gain block I'll use Opa4134. What you think? Thank you BWRX ! Best Regards ! |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
These opamps are reasonably cheap so why not get extras and some sockets and swap them out to see what you like best? I'm sure you could find some way to put any extras to good use
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sure !
But unfortunately the OPA4134 is not avaliable in DIP package
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Believe it or not,some hi-end manufacturers still stick with the TLO7x series as their preamp or poweramp driver.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Nice !
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
You can get the OPA4228/OPA4227 in DIP
Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
But it costs two times the 4134.
4134 costs R$12 for me, and 4227/4228 costs R$28. Any alternatives? Thanks !!
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| gainclone sound differences | ionomolo | Chip Amps | 29 | 26th March 2010 10:07 PM |
| Revealing sound quality differences | maraudingtechie | Everything Else | 4 | 10th May 2009 07:59 AM |
| Tl074, Opa4134, Lme49740 | ztan | Solid State | 3 | 23rd June 2007 10:53 AM |
| Rotel RCD971 vs RCD991 - Differences Parts & Sound; Any photos of inside of 971? | dtm1962 | Digital Source | 3 | 28th July 2006 07:42 PM |
| Sound differences with Toroids | ralf | Pass Labs | 17 | 5th June 2004 08:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15079 seconds (56.34% PHP - 43.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |