Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th October 2003, 01:35 PM   #481
diyAudio Member
 
Joe Rasmussen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Joe Rasmussen
Quote:
Originally posted by planet10


Are you talking about the thingys that Allen said were an upgrade to the bottom of the Vacuum State cascode?

dave
HUSH!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003, 07:20 PM   #482
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
Default VBIGC success

Well, at last I have my VBIGC working and there is a big smile on my face

I have only had it running a few hours so please don't take my comments for anything more than initial impressions.

The sound is slightly more open than my OPA627 buffered IGC but in fairness that is using a cheap pot whereas the VBIGC has a stepped attenuator. Then again the VBICG has speaker protection (Velleman 4700).

There is a distinct difference between the two amps which I can best explain as the VBIGC sounding the more airy of the two. Somehow, the OPA627 version sounds a bit 'darker'.

Now also keep in mind that I will have to match the LPF's and put a stepped attenuator into the OPA627 to do a more objective comparison.

Of the two, I think that I prefer the VBIGC but how much that is down to the time and effort that I have put into creating it, I wouldn't like to say.

I will report back later with a hopefully more objective comparison but for now I would like to thank Joe R, Peter M, and Pedja for their help in getting me this far.

BTW, it's ironic that I discovered diyAudio forums while researching for a valve buffer earlier this year. While here I discovered the Gainclone and now, nine months later I have my valve buffer!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003, 07:53 PM   #483
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
More details of my VBIGC are now available on Decibel Dungeon.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003, 08:17 PM   #484
agent.5 is offline agent.5  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Good work Nuuk. I followed the link and read the your article, you mention a time delay of power to the amp because of tube filament warming. Are you taking about a delay to the B+ of the tube -- which I know is quite important, or are you talking about an additional delay to the op-amp (such as the 3875) as well?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003, 09:16 PM   #485
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
Quote:
Are you taking about a delay to the B+ of the tube -- which I know is quite important, or are you talking about an additional delay to the op-amp (such as the 3875) as well?
No, just a delay before the connection to the speakers is made.

It may be better to warm up the valves before the other circuits are powered up and that can be done with a delay circuit. But as I was using the Velleman speaker protection module, I am using that to avoid any squeal' from the speakers while the filaments warm up.

Others like Peter M use the delay circuit to switch on the valve and LM3875 after the valve heaters have warmed up sufficiently. I'm quite new to using valves but have read that it may not be too important to pre-heat the valves and in any case, I usually leave my power amps, powered up all the time.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2003, 09:22 PM   #486
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
Are you taking about a delay to the B+ of the tube -- which I know is quite important,
In this case no delay is necessary whatsoever.
Moreover, at start-up no delay is needed on high voltage tube circuits either...

Most damage is done at turn of where the heater circuits discharge much faster than the B+.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2003, 07:10 AM   #487
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: denmark
Quote:
Somehow, the OPA627 version sounds a bit 'darker'.
hi nuuk,

i'm not shure that you reached the potential of the opa627.....did you bias it into class a with a cascoded current source and perhaps the opa627 doesn't like to drive the lpf, perhaps a buffer in the feedback loop will do the trick or best - use a opa637bp with a buf634 in a jung multiloop with inner gain 300 and outer gain 2........?

and the better supply the better sound......
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2003, 08:07 AM   #488
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
Yes, I am not trying to say which buffer is best, rather point out the differences that I have noted. That's why I pointed out that these were just initial reactions.

I'm sure there is much more that can be done to both versions of these buffered IGCs and the advantage of having two great sounding amps is that one can be listened to while the other is modified.

At the moment though, I could do with a little break from more work and just sit back and enjoy the music. It seems like I have been building hi-fi non-stop for most of this year.
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2003, 08:33 AM   #489
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: denmark
Quote:
a little break from more work and just sit back and enjoy the music
wise words......its really what its all about...!

rock on and enjoy...
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2003, 11:42 AM   #490
Optical is offline Optical  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
So has anybody auditioned the tube buffered 'monster' with the 6 lm3886's?
Im quite interested to hear an opinion on the sound..
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Page generated in 0.12498 seconds (78.33% PHP - 21.67% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio