|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Any one built the bridged/parallel LM3886 using the National Semi ap notes? Here is a layout, constructive comments welcome....ap notes located here:
http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM3886.html
__________________
none |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well this must be a DIY site...no one noticed that pin 7 - ground is not connected...
__________________
none |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Your mute pin is open also
what cap value are you useing on your NFB? looks like a small film consider useing a high quality 47uf electrolitic bypassed with a 1uf metal film also run the cap/film first and the resistor to ground. Use .1% resistors or hand match 1%'s to .01% or better. I found 1.5 ohm output resistors to be the best choice and they also need to be 1% or better or hand matched. Are you useing a DRV134 or similar? or a differencial input? noise rejection becomes an issue with a DRV use a non-inv. buffer. Good Luck, I love my BPA's
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Opp's looks to be parellel straight through need to invert one side input,
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ap notes show no connection to mute. But I have seen boards with connections to mute.
Resistor values are per ap notes. Err....1.5 OHMS?...you may want to read page 11 of the application notes.... As for inverting input - check carefully - the inputs on the right side of board go into negative - positive on the left as per the ap notes...if all chip connections were identical then one would have to be inverted...this layout is the least complicated. Did you make your own boards or use prefabed pcbs...? Do you know which topology your BPAs use ?
__________________
none |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
The app notes give you a base circuit its not always optimal or preffered. With the mute pin open you will get no sound
BPA units can be very complicated, layout is of utmost importance, you will also find that feeding the circuit with a phase splitter like a properly implemented DRV134 with a buffer will yield better current control and sonics, you will always get different sonic and preformance from the chips being inv. on one side and non-inv. on the other just the nature of the beast. again good luck, I have built many BPA units and gone through alot of parts and had alot of fun while doing it. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
PS I make all my own boards.
1.5 ohm output resistors will only drop your voltage by .5 to 1V depending on Vs, but offer a 1.5* gain on current matching, helping the chip work together will yield the biggest preformance and sonic gains, in BPA units current flow and dissipation are your biggest problems and without servo's become a very big obstruction to overcome. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
i had made these. work well. using dual opamp to first half non-inv buffer then drives 2 parallel non-inv chips and inverting half of opamp to drive other two paralle chips. too ignorant to state flaws or measurement of the approach.
next thing with to try is using opamp and the parallel chip branches inside feedback loop - lightly discussed in another thread. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
QUOTE:
The app notes give you a base circuit its not always optimal or preffered. With the mute pin open you will get no sound 22Kohm resistor to the neg. rail, depending on Vs 20ma needs to be present at pin to turn on the chip. Thanks!...no sound would be a problem Since you have made your own boards do you have any pcb layouts you are willing to share? Not really interested in reinventing the wheel with the BPA200. The main interest in using the LM3886 was lower part count and advailability of power transformers over other designs. The lower LM3886 supply voltages allow easier LM317/337 voltage drop to opamp levels for a Linkwitz transform circuit. Reliability (especially long term) are important also, over what time period have you been operating BPA designs ?
__________________
none |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Vancouver, B.C.
|
Quote:
22k does sound reasonable though. -Nick |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bpa200 Opa549 Sub Amp | Gcollier | Chip Amps | 8 | 2nd October 2006 11:58 PM |
| Bpa200 | enter | Chip Amps | 2 | 3rd January 2006 08:16 PM |
| BPA200 PCB design | nterikun | Chip Amps | 1 | 13th September 2005 09:39 PM |
| My BPA200 PCB | Dxvideo | Chip Amps | 14 | 11th December 2003 07:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09857 seconds (82.77% PHP - 17.23% MySQL) with 11 queries |