|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
MY LM4780 to 3 link Amp
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
hmmm.... have something similar before in regards to an opamp up front driving them with an outer feedback loop. Not myref but a commercial 'bpa300' implementation. Except inner feedback was 56/1+1 and outter feedback 56/1+1.... It was a great sounding amp.
What is the philosphy of the opamp feedback wrapping the inner paralleled chips? What does the cap + resistor across the inputs do? (my ignorance). On other i've seen was 470pf solely... Paralleled 6 ? why not bridge to creat larger voltage swing? |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
- Tom Gootee http://www.fullnet.com/~tomg/index.html - |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Off the top of my head, there are a couple of standard reasons for putting a larger amp inside the forward part of the feedback loop of an opamp. One reason is to use the larger amp as a current/power booster for the opamp, often implemented with the gain of the larger amp = 1, so it's a buffer, but with much higher power output capability. If the larger amp is configured as a Howland-type current source, the whole thing can become a voltage-controlled current source, with relatively higher current output capability. (I haven't analyzed the OP's schematic fully-enough to know if that is what he did, here.) I have several power amplifier designs that put a chipamp into the forward part of the feedback loop of an opamp, solely to improve the performance of the chipamp. It can easily result in the improvement of the THD@20kHz by a factor of 15 or so, while also dramatically improving the transient response characteristics. - Tom Gootee http://www.fullnet.com/~tomg/index.html - |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
@ziling:
How does it sound? In comparison to the well known candidates (3875, 3886, ...)! Regards Thomas |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Gootee,thanks you for your explanation
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I also wanted to mention that by using several chipamps in parallel, inside of an opamp's feedback loop, there are ways to make a power amplifier that is amazingly good at driving very large capacitive loads, with truly-excellent transient-response characteristics, while still retaining extremely-low THD-20kHz. - Tom Gootee http://www.fullnet.com/~tomg/index.html |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sonic differences between inverting/non-inverting LM4780 VS both non-inverting LM4780 | jarthel | Chip Amps | 5 | 19th July 2007 12:37 PM |
| LM4780 from who? | jarre | Chip Amps | 6 | 10th August 2006 07:04 AM |
| lm4780 p/s | j9184p | Power Supplies | 4 | 28th June 2006 04:18 PM |
| anybody tried a LM4780? | travis | Chip Amps | 162 | 23rd March 2005 08:14 PM |
| lm4780 | odysseybmx414 | Chip Amps | 2 | 22nd February 2005 06:13 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12917 seconds (69.08% PHP - 30.92% MySQL) with 11 queries |