|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#981 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I use the same Conrad case for my brand new Nonoz II DAC...
|
|
|
|
#982 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
are the same... (though minor manufacturing differences could have occurred) Fedde |
|
|
|
|
#983 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#984 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
![]() See www.conrad.com... Fedde |
|
|
|
|
#985 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
|
There has been some discussion lately about the merits of inverting operation VS non-inverting operation for the GainClone circuit, so perhaps it is prudent to show that an opamp circuit can be switched either way as below.
I know the circuit given is configured for X1 gain, but circuit values can be suitably changed. I did also see a similar circuit in WW/EW circuit years ago that used a pot instead of a switch as the polarity selector. This gave +1 through 0 through -1 gain and polarity control, and was described as being useful for selecting reverb unit return signal polarity, but alas I forget the finer details - anybody have that circuit to hand ?. Either of these two circuits implemented correctly may be suitable to give the luxury of choice of GainClone operating mode. This circuit is of course perfectly suitable for line level polarity control, and could easily be incorporated into a preamp or cdp output stage. Eric.
__________________
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system. |
|
|
|
#986 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
__________________
UrSv Those who say it can't be done should not stop those who are doing it. |
|
|
|
|
#987 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#988 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
Conrad article 522945 and: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...716#post108716
__________________
UrSv Those who say it can't be done should not stop those who are doing it. |
|
|
|
|
#989 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bristol
|
does anyone know the exact amount of heat each chip creates at full volume? (a maximum)
i was thinking of using this diagram to bridge and parellel 4 together (4 chips) per channel and tri amp them this would give me 224 watts per channel, per speaker and then i was going to make a seperate sub woofer driver (posibly with the same chips) and then use 4 car batteries in series to give me +-24v (approx.) and put it in my car (when i get one).sound cool?
__________________
If it aint broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix it. If you can't fix it, take it apart and see how it "worked". |
|
|
|
#990 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
I tested my gainclone today
results: a little hum, and the output level is quite low (I wasn't using a pot, and the volume was a little more loud than a normal listening volume) I used peter's shematic, with a 220VA 2*18V transformer, and a TDA7294 (10K and 220K resistors) |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Freebird + Gainclone = "integrated" gainclone? | bikehorn | Chip Amps | 9 | 5th January 2006 03:07 PM |
| JLH v Gainclone? | Jezz-the-Fezz | Solid State | 5 | 12th December 2005 12:08 PM |
| Big gainclone | steven344 | Chip Amps | 10 | 23rd November 2005 07:58 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12278 seconds (78.28% PHP - 21.72% MySQL) with 11 queries |