Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st January 2003, 08:29 PM   #111
joensd is offline joensd  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Ups. Forgot the schematic:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg elvlm3886amp2.jpg (36.4 KB, 5554 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2003, 09:00 PM   #112
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
jean-paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Quote:
A bunch of people are getting excited about an IC amplifier when under normal circumstances, these things would not be given any respect whatsoever.Why? because Peter Daniel's does a really nice (and I mean REALLY NICE) job of packaging the things.
Mrehorst, you did not read the posts otherwise you would not say this nonsense. Peter Daniel & friends compared it with Aleph X and guess what amp was better. Please reread posts and not only the headlines before making comments.

Crap in a nice case would still be crap and comparing with tube or Pass DIY gear would be out of the question. Made by Peter Daniel or not, case made of solid gold or not. Even the "revealing" pics of the inside of a real 47 Labs Gaincard don't bother me as the endresult is what counts. Maybe National will come up this year with an audio IC that doesn't even need the resistors and other extra components.Imagine a 1 part amp with a 2 cap PSU that sounds better than some tubeamps and/or expensive semiconductor gear. BTW I think a lot of the latter possibly attract people with their looks and golden binding posts etc. Till recently I had a 300B push pull amp that was noticed immediately by everyone entering the room. Not that they listened, only the sight made them often say what a beautiful amp it was....

BTW there are more than just a bunch of people that like this amp.
It can be very refreshing to build one and at the same time see that some of your "audiobeliefs" can go overboard. Good audio is good audio whether it is realised with IC's, MOSFet's or those colouring devices that glow in the dark.
__________________
It's only audio
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2003, 09:50 PM   #113
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: denmark
amen......!
and btw, check out the intire range from jeff rowland, it uses lm 3886 chips - and sounding extremely good.......not only because of the ampchips but because they did a splendid job all over.
as far as i'm concerned - that means the potential is there.....!!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2003, 10:30 PM   #114
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by tbla
that means the potential is there.....!!!!!
I doesn't have to be the best. That they offer such potential with such simplicity* & with such a low financial investment is the beauty. Hopefully we will start to see more systems with many amplifiers and no passive XOs

* one of the beauties of the SE tube amp too...

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2003, 10:54 PM   #115
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
Quote:
Hopefully we will start to see more systems with many amplifiers and no passive XOs
I'm working on it!

MRehorst

If you look back over a few months you will see many of us have been extolling the virtues of gainclones, but I think it took Peter's superb presentation skills to bring it to the fore. I am now on my 4th or 5th version, and although I have never produced something as spectacular looking as his gainclone, my experiments have lead me to belive it is one of the best methods of driving speakers around, I was just loathe to praise it as highly because I suspected the reception that the idea would get. I was also reticent because I have not built DIY amps before, and so could only compare it to commercial offerings, not amps that many people on the board are familiar with.

If you doubt us, give it a go, it's cheap enough to experiment with, and if you hate it, come back and tell us, I for one will listen to well reasoned arguements, but build one first, and then comment from experience.
__________________
Al
I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2003, 11:32 PM   #116
grataku is offline grataku  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
MRehorst hit the nail right on the head. The only thing the LM 'whatever' has going for is that is cheap, easy to build, sure short signal path but so do all ICs, if it's built with good components it's probably going to sound better than 99% of the stuff of what the target clientele is used to/can afford, and all of this in relation to the speakers it's going to be paired with.
I have read the thread carefully, l see nothing to support that the chip sounds better than anything else. Now, if people want to take an Hoccam razor through the whole thing and convince themselves that they have the ultimate amplifier on their rack they can be my guest.
As far as I am concerned I have been down the IC road and I know exactly where it ends.
The underlying principle of this IC is the classic class B amp with current sources and mirrors, well studied protection circuits, nice bias adjustment (with diodes which should sound better). Coming from a single chip everything is probably well matched up. Throw a few components at it, come home from work, get a cold one, flip the switch sit on the divan and music is going to come out. It will probably be performing as well as your AKSA or the class B amp from Rod Elliot or thereabouts which is to say very well. Sorry Hugh and Rod don't mean to **** you off.
As far as comparing it to a class A, award-winning design that is such a crock I can't even begin to describe. It's actually offensive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2003, 01:42 AM   #117
diyAudio Member
 
MRehorst's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
I have read every post in this thread.

I have nothing against IC amps. In fact, I like them (and op-amps), for the same reason many DIYers do, whether they admit it or not- they are easy to work with, and success is almost guaranteed. I think though, that if someone had presented such an amp built into a pie tin, and claimed that it holds its own against expensive commercial gear, the person presenting it would have been laughed off the forum.

What does it say about the need for a high-end industry when $15 worth of parts can be turned into something competitive with multi kilobuck gear?

Of course, the listening test was done with specific sources and speakers and rooms and cable and yadda yadda yadda... There is no way a REAL high-end product could be beaten or matched by such a cheap assemblage of parts (especially not by an IC) under a broad range of test conditions, sources, speakers, cables, rooms, and etc., right?

Finally, Jean-Paul, where I come from, calling another person's statements "nonsense" is considered pretty rude. But hey, this is the internet, what should one expect?

MR
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2003, 05:48 AM   #118
diyAudio Member
 
tone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Malaysia
Send a message via ICQ to tone
Default servo circuit.file attached.

hi all,
pls can someone guide me ..how to fit a servo circuit into a inverted gainclone? thanks

rgds,
tone
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lm3886.mnl.jpg (30.4 KB, 5157 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2003, 06:01 AM   #119
diyAudio Member
 
analog_sa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
A servo is the last thing a gainclone needs. Unless you must screw the sound.

cheers

peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2003, 07:03 AM   #120
edm is offline edm  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The top of the Netherlands
Quote:
A servo is the last thing a gainclone needs. Unless you must screw the sound.
Analog_sa is this based on experience? Can you expand a little bit more on that, because like this i don't know how you did form this opinion and what to think of it.

Emiel
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Freebird + Gainclone = "integrated" gainclone? bikehorn Chip Amps 9 5th January 2006 03:07 PM
JLH v Gainclone? Jezz-the-Fezz Solid State 5 12th December 2005 12:08 PM
Big gainclone steven344 Chip Amps 10 23rd November 2005 07:58 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Page generated in 0.13903 seconds (77.92% PHP - 22.08% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio