|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
|
Hi,
How can I calculate Fequency cut off on my inverted GC with direct coupling ? The former parts is Tube out put for TDA-1541 Non oversampling DAC which use 0.47 uf cap for out put coupling. see schematic attached. regards Ball |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Look at the lm3875 datasheet page 16.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
The formula franz send me was.
=10^6/(2*PI*capcitor in nF*resistor in Kohm) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I am not too good at interpreting these chipamp schematics, but I think I see a problem. Please confirm or argue or whatever. The input to the inverted chipamp will see 10k + the slider resistance as it's source resistance (it will also see the 1M in parallel but in this case it is insignificant). The source resistance will vary with slider position. The gain will vary with slider position. So far no problem. The source resistance varies from 10k (when slider is at maximum attenuation) to 110k//1M (when the slider is @ 0db). The DC output offset will vary with the differing source resistance as the volume attenuator is swung through it's operating range. Problem? How much will the output offset vary with attenuation? BTW. the output capacitor will see the 1M @ the source end of the connector in parallel to the 100k attenuator and a varying resistance of 10k to nearly infinity also in parallel. The cap therefore sees about 9k to 90.1k after the 470nF and the cutoff frequency (-3db) will vary from 37.6Hz to 3.76Hz. About -1db from 75Hz @ 0db and 7.5Hz @ -70db. So much for direct coupling. Even -1db @ 7.5Hz will be audible as loss of bass. Understand the theory and consider the conditions from source to output (not just the amp in isolation).
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
F (-6dbV) = 1 / ( 2 pi R C ) [R in Ohms, C in Farads, F in Hertz]
C = 0.47 x 10^-6 When the pot is at very very low settings R = 1 x 10^6 || 1 x 10^5 = R1 R2 / (R1 + R2 ) = 90909 F = 1 / ( 2 x 3.14159 x 90909 x 0.47 x 10^-6 ) = 3.72 Hz When the pot is at highest setting R = 1 x 10^6 || 1 x 10^5 || 1 x 10^3 = 9009 F = 1 / ( 2 x 3.14159 x 9009 x 0.47 x 10^-6 ) = 37.6 Hz This is a seriously flawed design because the inverter input resistor Ri is much lower than the pot and so the low frequency roll-off changes dramatically as the pot is adjusted. The roll-off frequency is also too high at normal volume settings. You can keep the 0.47uF output cap if you add a buffer opamp between the pot wiper and the 10K resistor. An alternative is the increase the cap to say 4.7uF and change the 100K pot to 10K. This will give F low volume = 3.39 Hz, F high volume = 6.77 Hz. Just make sure the cathode follower works OK into a 5K load. HTH.
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
|
Hi All,
Thanks for your advise. I'm using ladder type stepped atten' and here this the value of R in my normal listening range. For my system, I never turn them over the 3pm position, that's 75k and 25k. ( normal listening level is 95k and 5k ). If my calculation is not wrong this will give feq. cut off below 10 Hz, is this seems to be alright ?
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
you have a very effective variable high pass filter between the source and amplifier. It would be a better design if you could eliminate the variable part and I suggest you take the high pass roll off down by one or two octaves or better still, three octaves lower. The design as you have it, is poor.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
|
Hi,
The picture above I just stick an inverted Gainclone shecmatic with the DAC output with 100k stepped attenuator between them. Just remove the input coupling Cap out of the GC schematic. Look like I'm better stay with the original design with coupling cap.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Direct Coupling question | angsuman | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 27th July 2008 12:33 AM |
| Direct-Coupling Question | sorenj07 | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 25th April 2008 06:43 AM |
| SE 6SN7/813 direct coupling | QuarkStrange | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 4th April 2005 11:00 AM |
| direct coupling | 2a3maniac | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 13th February 2004 09:36 PM |
| direct coupling | 2a3maniac | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 2nd February 2004 07:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12203 seconds (72.41% PHP - 27.59% MySQL) with 11 queries |