|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangkok
|
Refering to the schematic in the page 12th of the Bridge/Parallel Amplifier (BPA-200) documentation, I have some questions as follows:-
(1) At U1 and U2, the signal is sent to non-inverted input PIN, but at U3 and U4, the signal is sent to inverted input PIN. What is the purpose of this topology? (2) Let's focus on feedback, U1 and U2 uses 20.5Kohms. However, the feedback of U3 and U4 uses 21.5Kohms. OK this may be just a little but why doesn't it use the same value? (3) The circuit uses 4.7uf (Ci1, Ci2, Ci3, and Ci4) as coupling capacitors, doens't it? So we can change it to 2.2 or 3.3uf? (4) Are there any ways to tweaking up this National's design? (5) The document suggests using servo to eliminate DC offset. Can we neglect these servo stuffs? Thank you !! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the Wild, Wild West
|
1 - This is Bridge/Parallel, one side of bridge is running non-inverting, other side is running inverting. This makes a bridge. The chips configured the same are in parallel.
2 - Gain for inverting, Av = -Rf/Ri, non-ionverting gain, Av = 1+ Rf/Ri, hence the difference to get equal gain on both sides of the bridge. 3- I don't see those on page 12. 4 - Yes, add more in parallel or add servos 5 - yes, see the circuit on page 15. -SL |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangkok
|
Thank you. Just another basic question: Can we apply this circuit to LM3875 instead of LM3886?
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
yes you could but the limitations into lower impedance loads will be the same as the limitations of a single LM3875 compared to a single LM3886. In other words why would you ? /sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangkok
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
For bridging you should consider 3 or 4 in parrallel per side, i.e. for a BP200-u-like use 6 or 8 LM3875s per channel. Some advantages in the extra heatsink contact area. /sreten.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BPA200 psu layout | digi01 | Chip Amps | 6 | 11th September 2008 02:23 AM |
| bpa200 question | ryan750 | Chip Amps | 14 | 28th June 2008 07:58 AM |
| Bpa200 Opa549 Sub Amp | Gcollier | Chip Amps | 8 | 2nd October 2006 11:58 PM |
| Bpa200 | enter | Chip Amps | 2 | 3rd January 2006 08:16 PM |
| My BPA200 PCB | Dxvideo | Chip Amps | 14 | 11th December 2003 07:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08851 seconds (75.04% PHP - 24.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |