|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skåne
|
Long time reader, first time topicwriter!
This summer I have desided to do something about my spare lm3886. objectivs - two lm3886/board - versatile module that can be configured in stereo, bridge and parallel mode - on board power supply - just add transformer - diy etched pcb I use Eagle light which means that I'm limited to a board size of 100*80mm. Since I'm planning to etch my own pcb I want to make a single sided one. This makes it a little bit cramped on the pcb! I would very much like you to take a look at my board before I start to etch and buy components. Should I give it a try? Is there any obvious errors? The "groundplane" seems a bit anorectic to me... Schematic Board /Per |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Why don't you try using inverting amps for both stages?
That may eliminate your DC servo and some other parts too. Things will be less cramped too. Completely agreed on doing a single-side pcb. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
One quick glance..the servo IC o/p should be fed to inv i/p of 3886 ? right ? or interchange the servo ic i/p pins either way same result...
__________________
SivanandBalan |
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skåne
|
Quote:
Quote:
If I decide to keep the dc-servos, I belive the number of components is almost the same in inverting and non-inverting mode. To eliminate components I have to get rid of the dc-servos, right? Is an inverting lm3886 a better choice without dc-servos? |
||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
But that is not my point. The main purpose of DC servos is to cut DC offset. On non-inverting amps you use a large capacitor on the feedback. On inverting amps you can get away with smaller cap, usually series 4.7uF or less, that can be a film type. Parts count is also less, but not that much really, perhaps one resistor and one capacitor less. It is if you don't add the servo. IMHO a well implemented inverting gainclone will sound a bit better than a non-inverting one, but that may not be as important if you use things like good de-coupling and short pcb paths. Using less parts may make such paths really short. That's all I intended to say. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Skåne
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bangalore
|
Can you please attach the files again, they dont show up on your previous post
rgds, /mp |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thats sweet
Where'd you get those inductors? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Good job!
Sound good? |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15323 seconds (68.82% PHP - 31.18% MySQL) with 9 queries |