|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toulouse
|
Hi all,
I 've already built a GC lm3875 dual mono bought from chipamp.com. It sounds great. But, now, I have to build an amp (LM3886) for my brother and I hesitate between Mauro Penasa's design and the one on chipamp.com with snubbers. Which one might sound better ? Have anybody built both ? Thx Volta |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
|
Hi there Volta. When I was considering them I was recommended Twisted Pear. I'm still building a basic LM3875 but I intend to build a kit from there next...
__________________
Usually mitigation for all my dumb questions: I will endeavour to make sure I explain everything I find out on www.substitutereality.co.uk so that other newbies like me have a useful resource to check first... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
They sound different, and depending on your preference one may not sound better than the other or something else...
With that said I loved the snubbered 3886 but then built Mauro Penasa's My_Ref (rev C) and compared. With a passive in both there's not alot in it. Don't confuse that with thinking I mean they sound the same, they don't. What I mean is the 3886 for me is a little more musical - an easier listen, because the amp compared to Mauro's is quite lazy. And what does that mean? Well I found Mauro's design quite a bit more accurate and therefore not as easy a listen as more things grab you by the ghoulies and demand your attention - obviously this will suit some more than others. The 3886 is a little laid back, or lazier and so the music flows a little easier. To throw this on its head I changed the input and feedback cap on Mauro's amp to auricap and black gate which changed the bugger quite dramatically. Added a 627 pre (cheers Rabbitz!) and that made things better again. Anyway, this could go on forever and you still wont know which you or your brother like as you haven't heard them ![]() Either is a winner in my books. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Quote:
[looking over the shoulder for the knife] Have you had a look at the pics I sent you of the FE127E speakers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Just to clarify between the 2 amps, I do prefer the Mauro by some margin but not with a passive pre - then it's very close and mood dependant.
Quote:
![]() Yep, seen the pics. Who built them... No really... who..? hehehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toulouse
|
Ok thanx LazyFly, now I understand they sound different.
I think I will go first for Mauro Penasa's My_Ref but with passive Pre. If I'm not satisfied, I'll build an active pre. What improvements can we get with an active pre ? Volta |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi Volta, I have tried the My Ref with my new Joshua Tree attenuator which has a constant output impedance of only 750ohms. It works extremely well alone in front of the power amp. But you if you need more gain (not likely but possible) you might try the Kookaburra without the output buffer (it is not needed for a 100K load like the MyRef) The main advantage of a preamp into the MyRef is a low output impedance into the amp and some gain. MyRef already has a lot of Gain so you really don't need a lot more. I alternate between listening with just the attenuator and with several preamps I have. I can't seem to decide which I like best, but I would say it sounds excellent either way. If I had to say I would say that the attenuator input is just a tad more laid back, but I think this is largely a function of gain. Cheers! Russ
__________________
Less pulp more juice Twisted Pear Audio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
PS, tried the 2134 in the same circuit and didn't like it nearly as muchand in that case I prefer the passive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Quote:
It was me... I built them.... me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
You will do good in remembering the Rev C also includes softstart and DC protection...circuitry...
I have a set, and although was not completely happy until I got an active pre, I wouldn't part with it easily, I have allready been offered like 4 times what it would cost for a new one after someone heard mine. As I sayd though, I didn't always like it as it seemed too detailed in sound. Now I immediatly notice the LACK of detail on other systems. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lm3886 design | pingu | Chip Amps | 15 | 7th June 2009 03:49 PM |
| yet another lm3886 design | geekysuavo | Chip Amps | 0 | 31st July 2008 11:18 PM |
| 8 X LM3886 design sought | gary h | Chip Amps | 18 | 25th January 2008 02:36 PM |
| Datasheet Lm3886 Design and others. | samsagaz | Chip Amps | 1 | 29th December 2007 02:53 AM |
| Design from scratch (LM3886) | VEC7OR | Chip Amps | 25 | 30th September 2004 02:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14105 seconds (77.27% PHP - 22.73% MySQL) with 11 queries |