|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Niedersachsen
|
Hi
What kind of PSU whould u suggest for five 3886 clones? I don't want to use 5 little transformers. I prefer a single one with about 400-500VA (enough ) I want to adopt this disign here, because I can save the PCB: http://dogbreath.de/Chipamps/GainCar...nCardCopy.html I don't want to use a snubber PSU with big caps, just the suggested 2200µF. (Bad idea?) Main question is: whould it be a serious disadvantage to use a single big rectifier for all 5 Channels? I think something like that:http://www.schuro.de/Daten/Fairchild/RHRP1560.pdf |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
There is no need to have a separate transformers for each channel. For 5 channels , 500W trafo is about the lowest value you should go(i would use approx 600W). Filter caps should be 5,000 - 10,000 uF for best results , so total capacitance of about 25,000 - 50,000 uF is needed per rail. For rectifier , you don't need ultrafast diodes , they are designed for high frequency circuits.A standard powerful bridge rectifier(40A or so) should be better here. Regards, Lukas. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Niedersachsen
|
Quote:
I've read that many people use smaller caps, like the 2200µF in the link i posted, because more would affect the reproduction of higher frequencies? Or Do u mean with a snubber? I liked the Idea of using only 2200µF per IC, those big caps for five channels are quite expensive... What do u think about the that circuit in the link? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
Larger caps will provide better ripple filtering. I think the main reason why lower value caps are used is usually cost.A small(0,1uF) ceramic cap must be placed near IC pins to improve high frequency filtering. Regards, Lukas. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Windy City
|
Quote:
However, if you're not regulatingm 100VA/ch is generally an absolute minimum. 150VA/ch (and these days more) is preferred. Without the big caps, the trafo has to have that surge capacity. At any rate, one bridge is fine. Though some think the rectifier/diodes used can also change the sound. . . ![]() C |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lm 3886 | larryg | Chip Amps | 6 | 1st June 2009 06:38 PM |
| Using +/-70V on a LM 3886 | Pery | Chip Amps | 17 | 23rd July 2007 09:58 PM |
| 3886 oscillating? | mantisory | Chip Amps | 7 | 27th December 2006 05:22 PM |
| pre amp for 3886 | bostonswoop | Chip Amps | 6 | 19th June 2006 02:58 PM |
| Impressions of Snubbered BrianGT 3886 vs Reg 3886 | moving_electron | Chip Amps | 1 | 23rd March 2005 06:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08358 seconds (77.66% PHP - 22.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |