|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: india-chennai
|
Hello everyone, i am new to this community. I am a crazy fan of audio electronics. Mainly i've used 2050 till now. Actually i wish to know which technique is better for getting more power like:
1. normal bridging . 2. parallel connection of 2 chips 3. fedding inverted input to one IC and non-inverted input to second IC |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
About performance, parallel and bridging attend different objectives: paralleling amps increase output current capacity for thirsty speakers, like 4 ohm types; bridging increases output wattage capacity, that is provides more power for 8 ohm speakers. But the actual listened output may depend mostly on speaker efficiency. That is a low efficiency 4-ohm may sound louder than a high efficiency 8-ohm for the same power, when it should be the opposite. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Bridge connection and parallel connection are two different things. To the thread starter: You must first ask yourself how much power you want into which load.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
|
1 and 3 are the same thing.
__________________
- Dan |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brazil
|
Quote:
Look again: I said 1 and 3 are the same thing, not 1 and 2. Carlos |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
You did some editing meanwhile I answered as you can see.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Maybe 1 and 3 aren't the same thing.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KL
|
Guys,
Have you ever tried this balance circuit? Will it work? I've build it but the output went to positive rail. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: malaysia
|
Quote:
You don't need R3 & R13, if you want you can replaced R3 with 10 ohm 2W resistor parallel with an inductor (single layer winding of gauge 18 enameled wire on the 2W resistor) and remove R13 completely. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: S Yorkshire OK
|
With chipamps, for high power you may need to both bridge and parallel, to keep heat per chip in limits. See NS AN1192.
Bridging alone is arguably most commonly done to get maximum watts from a given (and limited) voltage, eg, a car's 12-14V. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Amp bridging and performance question | augerpro | Solid State | 10 | 15th June 2008 06:45 PM |
| A Note to the Wise ..... | MJK | Full Range | 3 | 4th September 2006 09:19 PM |
| Is it wise? | lumanauw | Class D | 32 | 18th October 2005 03:09 PM |
| [n00b] Realistic, would it be wise to DIY | moviedrome | Parts | 4 | 14th November 2004 07:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |