|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: KL
|
Right now I'm facing a very serious problem of my power amp using TDA2050 in parallel configuration. My power amp i.c. keep burning. I've changed 6 pcs of TDA2050 and the problem still the same. First I thought that I might using a too small heatsink for 4 pcs od TDA2050, after that I changed to a bigger one, but the problem still the same, blown. After that I changed the zobel network resistor to 4.7ohm, but the i.cs still blown. Can anyone tell me how to do? I followed the circuit diagram given by ST Electronic, what I modified is make it to parallel using 2 0.1ohm resistors in each output and the zobel network after the 2 0.1 ohm resistor. HELP!
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Start by changing the current sharing resistors from 0R1 to 1R, then you stand a chance of finding out what is happening without smoke.
0R1 is too low anyway, I would use 0R22 in a design. Is this chip safe paralleled? When there is an overload one chip will always limit first and the other will then drive the disabled output. Most ICs are only specified with short to ground. National seem to have got this right. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Yangon
|
Hello Matthewong,
I already tested with 4 tda2050 ( Bridge parallel ). I used BPA200 circuit design. ( from national ). I think you can parallel with that design. You can see in http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74007 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: KL
|
seems like ur given URL has some problem there, can't find the page.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: KL
|
One more thing, I have tested both bridged parallel and parallel only. But the conclusion I have got was parallel only configuration was the sound more control than the bridged parallel configuration. What do you guy think? Need some recommendation here.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
I suspect that the high quality of the simple chip amps comes from just how easy it is to get the pcb layout right with proper dcoupling and routing of power and ground.
By the time you have expanded to a bridged and paralleled solution, correct layout is not so easy. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tda2050 | Jpoole908 | Vendor's Bazaar | 0 | 1st June 2008 06:34 PM |
| Replacing TDA2030a with TDA2050 in parallel | hernanstafe | Chip Amps | 4 | 16th March 2007 01:52 AM |
| TDA2050 parallel. HELP! | Matthewong | Chip Amps | 11 | 13th February 2006 02:11 AM |
| Tda2050 | Mr. Triatic | Solid State | 8 | 26th April 2004 06:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08173 seconds (77.75% PHP - 22.25% MySQL) with 10 queries |