|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
I have done a search but and can't seem to find if this has been discussed before.
I want to build a pair of LM3875 Gainclones that will only be used to power 8 ohm tweeters crossed over no lower than 6 kHz. And I am wondering what the optimum value would be for the power supply capacitors (on the pins of the chip). My first thought is to stick with 1000 uF but is there anything to be gained in going a bit lower? And I am also thinking of bypassing the electrolytics with 0.1 uF film caps!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
Well if you can go low enough, then you could use better than electrolytic caps I guess. I certainly found that bypassing with 0.1 polys has huge impact.
I guess it also would depend on what PSU you're using, as you could go real small for the caps on the pins anyhow. edit: assuming this is for a multi-way active setup, then personally I would like all amps used exactly the same. But this is just me.
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
1000 uF works very well for the full-rangers at present so I'll probably stick with that but it should be possible to go lower with the tweeters. And as you point out Vikash, that would allow something more 'exotic' to be used if (I feel the need)!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Nuuk, to power the tweeters you should be better using the LM3886.
The LM3875 has no mute circuit, and it produces a small turn on/off thump. Not good if you are using the tweeters without any protection, like a series cap. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
Quote:
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Linaeum Dipole Tweeter as a Super tweeter? | ktuuri | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 17th June 2008 06:52 PM |
| Bypass caps for tweeter GC | cm961 | Chip Amps | 2 | 29th January 2004 05:51 PM |
| replacement tweeter caps | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th August 2003 06:14 PM |
| tweeter caps on Ariel Mark II | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 1 | 13th August 2003 06:19 PM |
| Caps series with tweeter | nar | Multi-Way | 0 | 27th June 2002 05:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14541 seconds (68.64% PHP - 31.36% MySQL) with 10 queries |