|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
|
Hi,
I’ve been trawling through the archives looking at posts about the mute resistor and if it had any bearing on sound quality. There is not much here even though this resistor supplies current to the input stage so you would think this could be an area to improve all Lm chips that have a mute function. One post that caught my eye was by Xelb. “After trying a few resistors I tried the -Vcc connected directly to the mute pin And yes, this is another step forward in the LM3886 implementation ” Has anyone else tried this? At first this sounds wacky but if the mute function has a built in voltage/current protection then this might not only work but also may be step forward removing one more unnecessary component from the system. Does any one else have any experience with this idea? Cheers, Anthony |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
After reading Xelb, I really wanted to calculate the exact (or maximum) current drawn from the mute pin, but priority went to other projects.
Xelb uses too high a supply rail but that doesn't trigger the protection. So may be the bias for input is reduced due to the removing of mute resistor and affects the allowed maximum supply rail??? Just a curiousity. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
HI
![]() The way I see it is that the mute resistor does not affect the bias of the input stage. Far as I can tell it switches off a transistor that sinks the input stage curent, thus switching off the input stage amplification and attenuating the output. I'm sure more experienced people will have a better technical explanation. As for connecting the pin directly to the rail, yes there is a 1K resistor internally connected to this transistor, which I believe will limit the current passing through the sink. That said, National would have considered connecting it directly to rail and I'm sure there is a good reason for the resistor, however one can go as low as possible, I would consider about 10 mA the upper limit, about 5mA is OK as a base calculation for the resistor. Again, feel free to try it. The worst is the chip will fail (not likely IMO) and you'll need a new one. I don't know if the protection is at all linked to the input stage, only the output transistors. I am using too high a supply rail in almost all my projects (over-zealous transformer specs, + poor regulation in transformers) and I don't manage to get the protection to kick in. Those tolerances are accounted for by manufacturers. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
My guess is that the external resistor is there to slow down the charging of Cm so that the time delay for turn on is maintained
![]() Tony. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
If you choose 10k you don't have to worry. I have taken a bit more because I wanted more delay with 100 uF.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
I know that the resistor is not for muting the amp
without it the amp (or at least a connection to the +ve rail) the amp will allways be muted. Think about what the capacitor Cm (as stated in the datasheet "to create a large time constant for turn on and turn off muting) does. While it is charging there is no voltage getting to pin 8 to turn off the mute, if you don't have the resistor this cap will charge very quickly. It is my understanding that this cap is there to ensure the amp remains muted until it reaches a stable operating state so you don't get any nasty noises on your speakers when you first turn on the amp. Now do you still think I haven't read the datasheet peranders ![]() Tony. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
I'll believe you
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Cm is also optional (I don't use one, but that's more because I use P2P and every added component is a pain...
BTW I'm using LM4766 and 4780, so less components are better as those pins are too tight otherwise... |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wire Wrap connections for point to point | mashaffer | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 7th July 2007 01:11 PM |
| Benifits of point to point wiring for digital circuit? | MGH | Digital Source | 15 | 14th September 2006 10:17 PM |
| Anyone use magnet wire for point to point wiring projects? | Hybrid fourdoor | Parts | 10 | 2nd February 2004 08:11 AM |
| Audio Note's Kit One done in point-to-point wiring | Wram | Tubes / Valves | 18 | 29th April 2003 10:59 PM |
| please help - no mute but did mute mod - tda1541 | loomis | Digital Source | 1 | 14th November 2002 10:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15757 seconds (59.61% PHP - 40.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |