|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
I have built several DIY projects including STK 4192II power amp, STK 6238A equalizer and several other power supply projects. I am still in the early stage of the learning curve of designing the circuits but I am determined to learn it.
For STK amp I have built the preamp-tone control module based on a circuit published in a magazine using LM 349 Quad-op-amps! After visiting this wonderful forum I learnt that for buffer stages the better op-amp options are NE5532, TL072 and some OPA/BB modules. As TL074 is pin compatible with LM349, I am wondering whether I can replace the LM349 in my Preamp module with them. I am planning to build better regulated, discrete PSU for the preamp too. Can one of the experts here advice me whether I can replace the LM349 with TL074 in the following circuit without any change in the passive components? If passive component are to be changed, what should I change? Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NEW DELHI
|
if these opamps r pin compatible then u can safely replace them.
no need to change any passive components remember::::do not forget to put decoupling caps with each chip!they r absolutely essential.
__________________
Never Underestimate The Bandwidth of A Station Wagon Full Of Magnetic Tapes Hurtling Down The Highway...................Andrew S Tanenbaum |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Thanks it works and a significant improvement of sound! I think I can find other alternatives too in the local market. What about OPA4134, OPA4132 and OPA4228? Will they work in the circuit without any change in the passive components?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
|
TL074 is a yucky op-amp IMO. OPA4134 and OPA3142 should work out quite well. Also, replacing the coupling caps with high quality polypropylene or polyester caps (if they are poor parts like electrolytic) will also help. Might as well make sure all the caps aren't electrolytic, since they aren't very large sizes.
__________________
The power of Science compels you! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
OPA packages are not available in quad configuration! OPA 4134 is available only in SOIC package. The local distributor for the Farnell only gives me few options.
As NE5532 seems to be a good cost effective option can somebody help me to find whether quad configuration available with NE series an in TL074 [TL072 series] I really think tone controls is a must though recent audiophile thinking is otherwise. http://zero-distortion.com/views/ton...econtroles.htm Can I implement active volume control after the circuit given above shown in the following link? http://sound.westhost.com/project01.htm |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NEW DELHI
|
if u getting opa4134,use it.its a wonderful ic.far better than 074,ne etc.
even if its a surface mount,modify it as something given here http://www.soundodyssey.com/AudioParts/OpAmps.html the sonic benifits of opa far outweigh the little extra effort.
__________________
Never Underestimate The Bandwidth of A Station Wagon Full Of Magnetic Tapes Hurtling Down The Highway...................Andrew S Tanenbaum |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
some alternates suggestions that are pin to pin compatible with TL074 are
OPA4134,LM324(crappy though), LM348, TL084, LM349 BTW OPA4134 is available in PDIP package with retailers u have to find the right one BUt do remeber my experince suggests usage of single OP AMP as dual or quad amps do have some cross talk between channels. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Thanks for all the infomation. I have built with separate opamps for each channel for better seapration. I am going to add following circuit from ESP projects after the above preamp circuit. Will it give some problems?
I would love to have links regarding proper earth(ground) techniques and proper routing techniques for building circuits. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
visit analog devices website, there u could find articles about grounding techniques and star ground atheories.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NEW DELHI
|
t.i also has good articles
moreover esp site's articles section also has good article.
__________________
Never Underestimate The Bandwidth of A Station Wagon Full Of Magnetic Tapes Hurtling Down The Highway...................Andrew S Tanenbaum |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| adding tone control to active crossover | Dan2 | Solid State | 5 | 5th December 2008 03:35 PM |
| Baxandall active tone control | jenks | Solid State | 3 | 18th April 2008 10:18 PM |
| i need preamp schematics w/o tone control or volume control | hernanstafe | Parts | 7 | 30th January 2008 04:12 AM |
| Active filter/Tone control | Amagic | Parts | 5 | 20th July 2007 07:57 PM |
| 3-Ch LM3875 w/ Tone Control and Active Crossover | StalfoS | Chip Amps | 6 | 11th January 2005 01:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11836 seconds (79.68% PHP - 20.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |