|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greece
|
Hi all,
I'm building two, three chanells amplifiers based on parallel LM4780 chips for my three way speakers. Just completed the amplifier and power supply boards, I choose high capacitance (10000uF) for the bass amplifiers and low capacitance (1000uF) for the mid and tremble amplifiers. Each amplifier module has its own Power supply PCB. I still need enclosures and power transormers. Sound wise, is there any good reason not to use a single transformer (24v+24v secondaries @ 1000VA) to supply all three PS modules and amplifiers? Is it better to use different secondaries (i.e. 24v+24v+24v+24v+24v+24v @ 1000VA) for each module and even better to use different transformers? Regards P |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
I would go for two traffos, one driving the woofers, and the other the mids and highs.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greece
|
Quote:
Is this going to be better than multiple secondaries? Thanks for the reply. P |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greece
|
Anyone???
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
|
I would go for the big transformer but run separate bridges.
__________________
UrSv Those who say it can't be done should not stop those who are doing it. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greece
|
Quote:
This what I'm thinking, but would I have the full advantages of tri-amp this way? Regards P |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
My vote goes to:
two monoblocks, two transformers in a each monoblock; bass + mid/high. Regards, Milan |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greece
|
Quote:
P |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
Even better is separate transformer for each drive unit/amp/channel. That would give you two trafos (one per channer) with 6 24V secondaries each, or (even better) 6 trafos with 2x24V each. As you already have independent PSUs for each amp, it's just a question of trafos. And that depend$ on how much you wanna $pend. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LM4780 in parallel...? | j.wright | Chip Amps | 9 | 9th June 2008 10:24 PM |
| FS: 4 Channel Parallel LM4780 gainclone | Matt_Tillard | Swap Meet | 8 | 10th January 2007 09:08 PM |
| I'm wiring my 4 channel 8 parallel LM4780 boards... check my wiring :) | Audiophilenoob | Chip Amps | 9 | 16th August 2005 05:37 AM |
| ==>> Parallel 4x LM3875 for 2 ohm speaker - pls advise.. | metha | Chip Amps | 24 | 18th April 2004 09:29 PM |
| Help! Parallel 2x 3875 per channel design - please advise. | loong | Chip Amps | 23 | 3rd April 2004 11:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10591 seconds (75.95% PHP - 24.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |