Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Which pcb is better (LM4766)
Which pcb is better (LM4766)
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd June 2005, 12:41 PM   #1
linket is offline linket  Lithuania
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vilnius
Question Which pcb is better (LM4766)

I decided to build and amp using LM4766. Everything seems ok - the parts are cheap, scheme is easy, but one day I accidentaly found some guy's PCB and similar schematics to the auxiliary circuit in pdf. Here it is:


Is it risky to do an amp using his pcb? Or do I need to go on a pdf variant? I found some differences like the boucherot cell in pdf stands before the coil, and in this pcb - after. Thanks for

Here's pdf for comparison:
http://<br /> <a href="http://www.a...M4766.html</a>
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd June 2005, 03:47 PM   #2
Leolabs is offline Leolabs  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
Leolabs's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bukit Mertajam
Send a message via MSN to Leolabs
If u r not sure,then try the pdf version.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2005, 07:14 PM   #3
SpittinLLama is offline SpittinLLama  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the Wild, Wild West
I'd put it before the coil.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2005, 06:24 AM   #4
rajudiy is offline rajudiy  India
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default works good

i assembled this board


and the working was very good

  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2005, 06:53 AM   #5
peranders is offline peranders  Sweden
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
peranders's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Which pcb is better (LM4766)
rajudiy, you can't copy an URL with just copying the visible text. You have to right-click and choose something like "copy link location".
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
Group buy: DCT03 DC trap for big toroidal transformers. Sign up for interest HERE. 65 pcb's in order. 59 paid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2005, 10:00 AM   #6
sangram is offline sangram  India
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India

IME, 4766 is quite pathetic when it comes to the sound. Takes a lot of burning in, the sound for the first hour sounds shouty and closed in, gets better after about 15 hours. I expect some more improvement. However, channel separation specs are anyway very low, so unless you do pure dual mono with 1 chip per channel in bridged/parallel/biamping, I doubt very much this chip can be used for hifi. The sound kind of reflects that shortcoming (and many others) and I feel that even TDA 2030 beats it on pure SQ terms, though not on power.

It's dead silent and easy to work with though on the positive side, I've used P2P and though it's a little messy to look at, there's no noise / hum on the output. If proper heatsinking is done, the chip can take a lot of abuse without getting toasty.

Far as that modified schematic goes, zobel should be before the coil. Also the feedback resistors seem to have very high values, this is a subject for some discussion, because we almost always use smaller values for the feedback resistors. Accordingly the value for the blocking cap must increase as per the equation in the data sheet. I think the amp is designed to accomodate polyester/metallised caps in that position, looking at the PCB layout. This is not needed and a normal electro works fine as it is only a blocking cap and should not affect the signal.

Also muting can be combined into one single resistor/cap and does not need to be separated for both channels. The national PDF gives the equations on how to calculate its value.

Zobel values will need calculating. Some people use 1 ohm, some people use 100 ohm. There's no 'right' value and it depends on your speakers, cable, amp layout etc.

And that PCB... looks mighty thin traces. I wold not trust it one bit, actually. Even though the amp is low power, the traces look like they will need some buffer wires definitely.
  Reply With Quote


Which pcb is better (LM4766)Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First DIY project - LM4766 meche Chip Amps 9 14th June 2007 04:54 AM
A different Chipamp - LM4766 JesseG Chip Amps 9 7th March 2006 04:12 PM
input for LM4766 with LM1036 renfrey Chip Amps 0 25th February 2005 03:46 AM
Why not use LM4766?and... Richard.C Chip Amps 5 24th August 2004 08:13 PM
Lm4766 sangram Solid State 0 17th March 2003 05:44 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio