|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NL, Voorschoten
|
changed my DAC(Elektor2000) analog output chips from OPA627 to AD8610. There are 4 of them 2 for the I/U conversion and 2 for the filter. Ok the AD8610 sounds bright. Sometimes a bit too bright. The Sssss sounds are not so nice as on the OPA627. Tried different speakers and the symtom stays. Amps are 2xUCD400 with AD8620's and a passive preamp. Dac unit is snubberized.
Anyone has the same experience? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Everything is so dependant on outside factors, but actrually I have noticed exactly the opposite.
I actually prefer the 8610/20 as much warmer less sybilant than the 627/637. And now I am trying the LT1115(low voltage noise) and LT1028(low current noise) both with great success. So much so that I find it equal to the 8620 on everything I have listened to so far. ![]() Also I can state that the LT1010 seems to be at least as good as the buf634, especially when fully biased. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Yes. The 8610 improves greatly with a buffer under the feedback loop. Imo the end result is better than a 627 alone or a 627+buf. It certainly is system/taste dependent.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NL, Voorschoten
|
Quote:
I will keep on testing it with all kind of music to see if the difference remains . |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
15V is above the max on the 8610/20 datasheet. In my tests this opamp sounds best between +/-10V and +/-12V above that and it gets nasty. For kicks I even tested it down to +/-5V and it still sounded great.
Above 12V the 627/637 are definately better. I still am not convinced the 627/637 are any better than the LT1115. But they are indeed much better than the opa227/228. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Decoupling for OPA627, LT115 and AD8610 | Sheriff | Solid State | 22 | 22nd February 2012 06:58 PM |
| AD8610, OPA134, OPA627, BUF634 SMD headphone amp | peranders | Headphone Systems | 72 | 29th June 2011 07:20 AM |
| My result of opa2134 and opa627 comparison | HiFiNutNut | Digital Source | 74 | 29th April 2008 10:47 PM |
| OPA627 vs AD8610 | Dr.H | Solid State | 58 | 8th April 2006 12:36 PM |
| Looking for AD8610, AD8620 | rbroer | Swap Meet | 1 | 9th January 2004 07:28 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09664 seconds (65.14% PHP - 34.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |