|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth
|
Hi guys,
Excuse my lack of electronics knowledge, this is all quite new! I'm building the standard Premium LM3875 non inverting GC kit (Brian's PCBs+components). I am not using a preamp, so I need a dual gang pot to attenuate the input. I [i]think[/] i need a dual gang 10k linear cermet, is this on target? Also where can I source a good quality one, preferably from an Australian supplier but will order international if needed. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you are looking for Australian supplier get this one: "Silver-Carbon" Pot ex Tawan - Photo - & ignore my ugly Pinky!
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth
|
Cheers heaps Peter. Tis a relief to see a AUS$7 pot literally a short drive from my place seems to be one of the best options.
![]() I'm interested in the law faked config using a linear pot, and I will be running 91db 4ohm speakers on these. Would you recommend 10k or 50k, with the 22k shunt resistor? At this price I might by both and experiment anyway. Also a description of exactly how to wire this correctly into the circuit would be greatly appreciated! I'm hoping to receive the kit in the mail any day now, can't wait to hear how it sounds. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal
|
i think this thread may also be helpful to you:
*technical elec question* DC offset/input impedance relation there is a spreadsheet in the last post to help you choose pot value. i will have to go against peter on this one (im thinking he didnt realise it) but you can't effectively use a linear pot value smaller than the shunt resistor although, a shunt value larger than pot works well if your pot is log taper, and im pretty sure thats what peter uses. with a 22k shunt, i decided to use a 250K linear pot.
__________________
Most people wouldn't know good music if it came up and bit them in the ***. - Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I was discussing log pots only. I don't have any experience with law fake setups, and personally I'm not really into it as those require high pot values, which seem not much appealling.
Besides, from some posts we've seen here, linear pots can have much more tracking error (between decks) than well made log pots.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Linear taped pot for volume regulation ? Who recomend here this nonsense ?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal
|
Thats what i was thinking peter, but findog mentioned he was looking for a fake-lawing solution, i was just giving him info for what he needed.
yes you are right, fake-lawing always requires larger pot values, but i think you could still maintain the advantage of lower pot values (lower-noise) by placing yet another resistor in parallel with pot (connected across the two ends, not to the wiper). this will keep your input impedence much more constant and low, eliminating the drawback of a large pot value. a 250k linear pot + 22k fake law + 22k 'consistency' resistor, will provide a log attenuation, and an input impedence equal to a 20k pot at min volume and an input impedence equal to a 10k pot at max value.
__________________
Most people wouldn't know good music if it came up and bit them in the ***. - Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
why don't you ask for the motivations/reasons for the recommendation instead of calling it nonesense? now its clear why many are hostile to your comments on this forum.
__________________
Most people wouldn't know good music if it came up and bit them in the ***. - Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
I think, that question was clear : pot for volume control. What do you mean by motivation ? Linear pot you can use only for " fine " input level tuning of two different amps, which are used commonly in active boxes. As volume regulator is this pot insufficient, which know every little child.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dual gang electrical box | merlin2069er | Parts | 0 | 6th May 2009 07:18 PM |
| Dual gang pot | burbeck | Parts | 5 | 30th October 2007 09:49 PM |
| BrianGT LM3875 NIGC Gounding Scheme | TheDriver41 | Chip Amps | 8 | 14th September 2005 08:14 AM |
| Biasing LM3875 (NIGC) into class A | Dr.H | Chip Amps | 1 | 3rd November 2004 08:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11847 seconds (76.68% PHP - 23.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |