Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th May 2005, 05:10 AM   #61
loong is offline loong  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Earth
Default Re: Improving the Non-Inverting chipamp

Quote:
Originally posted by carlosfm
There are advantages in using very low value resistors, and also with (consistently) manageable DC-Offset, so that the Ci cap can be discarded.

It works, it's simple, it sounds very good.
Even without matching impedances (because I use very low values, and the amp would need a buffer), DC-offset is around 30mv.

Carlos,

I did some quick experiment on LM3875 (24Vdc) using the value of R1 R2 R3 as 22K, 301 and 10K respectively. I am afarid the difference is not noticable in my system but the DC offset is very high ~600-900 mV. Is there something wrong with using these value of res?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2005, 03:20 PM   #62
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Default Re: Re: Improving the Non-Inverting chipamp

Quote:
Originally posted by loong
Carlos,

I did some quick experiment on LM3875 (24Vdc) using the value of R1 R2 R3 as 22K, 301 and 10K respectively. I am afarid the difference is not noticable in my system but the DC offset is very high ~600-900 mV. Is there something wrong with using these value of res?
What do you have before R1?
Input coupling cap?
A volume pot?
An active preamp?
A buffer?

If you respect the values of my schematic and only increase the value of R3 (feedback), if you need more gain, it should be ok.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2005, 10:48 PM   #63
XELB is offline XELB  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisboa
Quote:
Originally posted by carlosfm
No, I'm not joking.
I have this at home.

How does it sounds ?




I saw the picture of the inside of your amp. Do you have the PSU outside the amp ?
( I will put my PSU outside )




Carlos, can you tell me where to buy a nice and cheap 10k pot ?




Thanks.
__________________
If you want power you must add control
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2005, 11:27 PM   #64
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
How does it sounds ?
The Krell?
Powerful.
After the mods, a very good integrated.
Before?

Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
I saw the picture of the inside of your amp. Do you have the PSU outside the amp ?
( I will put my PSU outside )
Yes, I use an external PSU with this amp.
Regulated, snubberized.

Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
Carlos, can you tell me where to buy a nice and cheap 10k pot ?
You want cheap and very good?
Get these Alpha pots from Jaycar UK:
http://www1.jaycarelectronics.co.uk/...Max=&SUBCATID=
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 12:01 AM   #65
XELB is offline XELB  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisboa
I have to order at least £20 in components


But I was needing some new parts


BTW, thanks for the link, I didn't know this online shop






Quote:
The Krell?
Powerful.
After the mods, a very good integrated.
Before?
You just never stop "cooking" ......
__________________
If you want power you must add control
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 12:29 AM   #66
jleaman is offline jleaman  Belgium
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Send a message via AIM to jleaman
Default Re: Update: a hell of an amp

Quote:
Originally posted by carlosfm
With the second snubber near the chip, there are advantages in using bigger caps than 100uf.
I started testing with 470uf and yes, extreme bass gets tighter.
Then I tested 2,200uf and...


This is it!
Midband and treble are gorgeous, as ever, but the bass is really on another league.

PS: If you are wondering, I do not test amps with choral music.
There's a good recording from the beginning of the 90's (!) that always was a good test: Counting Crows - "August and everything after".
Believe me, very few amps can drive my Epos speakers with this disc.
This one does it:
Really good band / Artist. i like the song Ohma : O ) Or that whole cd for that fact : O )
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 11:42 PM   #67
XELB is offline XELB  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisboa
Carlos, have you ever tried to annul the DC OFFSET and take the capacitor C1(2.2uF) out of the LM3886 input?
__________________
If you want power you must add control
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2005, 12:04 AM   #68
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
Carlos, have you ever tried to annul the DC OFFSET and take the capacitor C1(2.2uF) out of the LM3886 input?
C1 is there to protect eventual DC-offset coming from the source, it has nothing to do with nulling DC-offset of the amp.
To null DC-offset to 0mv on the NI amp you can insert a cap between R2 and ground.
But as I use (and recommend) very low value resistors, that cap would have to be big and it would have impact in the sound.
For 100R (R2) the cap would have to be 470uf.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2005, 12:16 AM   #69
XELB is offline XELB  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisboa
To null the DC-offset of my "pre" SE to differential converter, I used this technique :

(the psu will be regulated(12V))

Click the image to open in full size.







The problem is that I have to tune the pot.... with some regularity


I think this way I will not need the cap C1 in the amplifier input
But I still have to test it... don't know if will work



Edit: I don't know if the symbol of the pot is correct
__________________
If you want power you must add control
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2005, 12:28 AM   #70
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
To null the DC-offset of my "pre" SE to differential converter, I used this technique :
I used a similar technique on my AD815 pre.
But you must have a well regulated PSU.
At least double regulation for that voltage.

Quote:
Originally posted by XELB
I think this way I will not need the cap C1 in the amplifier input
But I still have to test it
I don't dispense the input cap on the amp.
Gives me free of mind to connect anything to my system.
Some sources have (not negligible) DC-offset.
In your case that trimmer drifts, and DC-offset on the output of your pre will be amplified by the gain of the power amp (20~22x).
A source component that hits 10mv DC-offset on the outputs (even if it's only with music playin') will give you 200~220mv DC on the output of the amp.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what capacitor type is best used on Carlosfm's non-inverting chipamp? jarthel Chip Amps 8 24th August 2007 12:12 AM
sonic differences between inverting/non-inverting LM4780 VS both non-inverting LM4780 jarthel Chip Amps 5 19th July 2007 12:37 PM
Bridged/Stereo, w or w/o servo, inverting 3886, inverting buffer PCB Alexander Rice Chip Amps 9 27th March 2004 06:53 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Page generated in 0.12393 seconds (81.60% PHP - 18.40% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio