Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd February 2005, 05:36 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
toque_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ottawa
Default GC Transformer Considerations for 4 ohm spk

Hi Everyone,

Going to be assembling my LM3875 BrianGT kit soon and was wondering which transformer to go for. I currently have 8 ohm (~88db efficiency) speakers but will probably be moving to 4 ohm (89db efficiency) speakers eventually.

Currently I am running my lm3886 gc on 500va, 17.5 volt secondaries with no problems into my current 8 ohm speakers.

So, the transformer I was going to get is dual 18V, 300VA plitron. But, does the lm3875 require a higher supply in order to drive a lower impedance speaker? I was thinking of going to 20 or 22 volt secondaries instead? Any comments?

-steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 05:48 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
jeff mai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
Default Re: GC Transformer Considerations for 4 ohm spk

Quote:
Originally posted by toque_101
So, the transformer I was going to get is dual 18V, 300VA plitron. But, does the lm3875 require a higher supply in order to drive a lower impedance speaker? I was thinking of going to 20 or 22 volt secondaries instead? Any comments?
No - it's just the opposite, in fact. The LM3875 does better with lower rail voltages into 4 ohms. It has to dissipate less heat this way. The ideal situation, however, is to use your LM3886 amp on the four ohm speakers. It was designed to run at 4 ohms.

Read the National Semiconductor datasheets for these chips. It tells you all about this. Also, there is a lot of material you could find by searching this forum. This issue has come up literally dozens of times.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 08:05 AM   #3
Leolabs is offline Leolabs  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Leolabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bukit Mertajam
Send a message via MSN to Leolabs
True,lower supply rail safer for lower load
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2005, 02:54 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
toque_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ottawa
Thanks for the responses guys!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
X amp considerations DiMenSioN Pass Labs 26 30th May 2007 11:21 PM
Transformer Considerations MikeLewis Chip Amps 4 1st September 2005 08:31 PM
P3A considerations sobazz Solid State 52 3rd January 2004 02:19 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Page generated in 0.08208 seconds (73.77% PHP - 26.23% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio