diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Chip Amps (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/chip-amps/)
-   -   my active filter (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/chip-amps/51934-my-active-filter.html)

merlinx76 19th February 2005 08:01 PM

my active filter
 
I want to build an active filter for my subs with a highpass for my mains. My mains are sealed boxes with an Fsc of 73hz and a Q=.7.

I am thinking a 2nd order highpass for the mains and a 4th order lowpass for the subs all at about 73hz. Does this sound ok? Then the crossover meets at -6dB at 73hz?

Evan Shultz 19th February 2005 08:08 PM

The plan itself sounds fine, but the best result depends on your room's acoustics. I would suggest crossing the mains over a bit higher than their Fs. Say, 90Hz or so. And I would match the F6 point of the sub xover to the F3 point of the main xover since you are using a 4th with a 2nd order.

IMO LR is be the best rolloff slope to shoot for with audio, so I would choose that slope to approximate with the filters. Have you simulated the design? TI makes a program called FilterPro that would be a good program to use, and of course there are circuit simulators that would work well also. Good luck!

merlinx76 19th February 2005 08:19 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I meant that with the rolloff from the box included with the electrical rolloff of the HP filter would bring the response down to -6dB @ the crossover point.

I was just simulating with WinISDpro Alpha using a 2nd order butterworth HP and a 4th order Linkwitz-Riley LP.

The natural rolloff of the mains (without a filter) seems to look more like a bessel filter with a more gradual rolloff than a 2nd order butterworth.

Bill Fitzpatrick 19th February 2005 11:45 PM

Re: my active filter
 
Quote:

Originally posted by merlinx76
I want to build an active filter for my subs with a highpass for my mains. My mains are sealed boxes with an Fsc of 73hz and a Q=.7.

I am thinking a 2nd order highpass for the mains and a 4th order lowpass for the subs all at about 73hz. Does this sound ok? Then the crossover meets at -6dB at 73hz?

That's exactly what I have been doing for years. It's a no brainer. My mids have a Q of .7 and an F3 of 90Hz so that's where I xover. Even at 90Hz the mid excursion is a tad much at high levels so for my next improvement I'll be looking at 120Hz or thereabouts.

I can't imagine what room acoustics has to do with it.

cocolino 20th February 2005 01:07 AM

Quote:

originally posted by merlinx76
I meant that with the rolloff from the box included with the electrical rolloff of the HP filter would bring the response down to -6dB @ the crossover point.
This is "theoretically" correct when You use an electronic 12dB HP-filter with Fsc=73Hz and Q=0.7 for the mains and a 24dB LR LP-filter with Fsc =73Hz for the sub.

I say "theoretically" because as already mentioned, room acoustics (and baffle-step effects of Your "mains" as well) can have effects which might make it necessary to diverge from this "ideal" crossover to some extend, in order to achieve "ideal" (or improved) acoustic in- room response.


Quote:

originally posted by Bill Fitzpatrick
Even at 90Hz the mid excursion is a tad much at high levels so for my next improvement I'll be looking at 120Hz or thereabouts.
120Hz doesn`t matter for stereo-subs. For a mono sub 120 Hz would be too high IMO, even when crossed with a 4th-order LP.

Quote:

originally posted by Bill Fitzpatrick
I can't imagine what room acoustics has to do with it.
Subwoofers have anything to do with room acoustics, always.

Bill Fitzpatrick 20th February 2005 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cocolino

Subwoofers have anything to do with room acoustics, always.

I'm sure you going to offer an explation of what room acoustics have to do with the woofer to mid transition.

cocolino 20th February 2005 02:17 AM

Quote:

I'm sure you going to offer an explation of what room acoustics have to do with the woofer to mid transition.
Are You kidding me Bill?:)

A linear woofer mid transition (I wouldn`t call crossing in the range from 70Hz to 120Hz exactly a woofer/mid* transition) depends on the room and where in the room the sub/satellites ("mains" or "mid" as You call it) are placed and how far away the drivers are mounted from each other and from the floor and other room boundaries.
For obvious reasons to a lesser extend, this apply also when sub and main speakers are not seperated but in one box.

The crossover has to account for this effects and if necessary to equalize them.


*for me, "mids" begin rather higher in frequency, say from about 300Hz upwards and in this frequency range room acoustics would have indeed less impact.

merlinx76 20th February 2005 04:10 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Taking in room FR measurements is a whole project in itself... and I can't afford much at the moment... Not sure what to do. The XO point could always be changed without much difficulty later on if necessary.



Here's what my circuit looks like (XO @ 72 hz)... It's already getting kinda big and complicated for me. :xeye: I was trying to keep it as simple as I could.

I omitted the caps on the power leads of the opamps just to make it easier to follow.

Would there be a problem with crosstalk between the 2 channels the way I am mixing it?(do I need more buffers in there to prevent this?).

Any other problems?

note: I will not be using TL082's.

Bill Fitzpatrick 20th February 2005 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cocolino

Are You kidding me Bill?:)

A linear woofer mid transition (I wouldn`t call crossing in the range from 70Hz to 120Hz exactly a woofer/mid* transition) depends on the room and where in the room the sub/satellites ("mains" or "mid" as You call it) are placed and how far away the drivers are mounted from each other and from the floor and other room boundaries.
For obvious reasons to a lesser extend, this apply also when sub and main speakers are not seperated but in one box.

The crossover has to account for this effects and if necessary to equalize them.

Now you got the woofers wandering around the room where they don't belong. Mine are no further from my listening post than the sats. So the room boundaries effect the sats no more or less than the subs at the crossover freq. I certainly wouldn't correct room problems in the crossover anymore than I would correct them with an equalizer. Maybe your woofer-mids aren't transitioning but mine are.

cocolino 20th February 2005 09:23 AM

Quote:

originally posted by Bill Fitzpatrick
Now you got the woofers wandering around the room where they don't belong. Mine are no further from my listening post than the sats. So the room boundaries effect the sats no more or less than the subs at the crossover freq. I certainly wouldn't correct room problems in the crossover anymore than I would correct them with an equalizer. Maybe your woofer-mids aren't transitioning but mine are.
Bill,
I understand Your reasoning but there is at least one thing in the room which can be considered as a fixed element and which should be always adressed in the crossover - the floor.
I think You`ll agree that it makes a differenence for the sub/"mid" transition wether the sub-driver and/or the mid-driver is mounted near floor level or if it is on top of a 1,5m high box.


Quote:

originally posted by merlinx76
Would there be a problem with crosstalk between the 2 channels the way I am mixing it?(do I need more buffers in there to prevent this?).
merlin,
I haven`t recalculated if the values for Your aimed crossover frequencies are right but conceptionally I can see no flaws.
Only one (two things):
The input buffers output R`s (R1=100k, the other 100k I can`t read) which are going to Your sub`s summing amp. input are a bit high. IŽd go with half of that - 50k or maybe even 25k.
A summing amp`s sums up via the input resistors on it`s "-" input. I can`t see it clearly if You got this right on Your drawing.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2