|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
That "SMD GC" can't sound good, and there are several reasons why it just can't sound good.
Some reasons are very obvious, really. Everyone is free to spend the money and try it, why not? In original form, Brian/PD GC sounds much better, although it has problems driving most "normal" speakers. I still hope we are free to express our oppinions here.
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
IMO a LM3875 is perfect for 8Ohms, if you call 4Ohms is normal, well that´s your opinion but you can´t say it like you do as it is very misleading and a "non-technical" argument.
__________________
jens |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
The problem is the very low capacitance PSU. No, I don't consider 4 ohms "normal" speakers. Modern 8 ohm speakers (most bass-reflex) can go lower than 4 ohms. It is quite normal. That amp is not able to drive my Epos 11 speakers properly, and they are 8 ohms. Also, it is not my oppinion, I'm completely sure. I tested a low capacitance unregulated GC with lots of commercial speakers more that a year and a half ago and reported here the results. It couldn't drive most speakers. Before replying to me in those terms, read my posts, please. You just look at the chip? The chip alone can't make an amp. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Before you make very sure judgements it would have been good if you actually had listen and built my amp. You may have been disappointed, you may have not.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
roibm started a thread about building my gainclone. Of no particular reason carlosfm thought that LM3886 is not very suited for "normal loudspeakers. This may be true but I don't see in that way. I think LM3886 is surprisingly good.
The thread title is a bit provocative but so was also carlos comment. Let me add that he thinks that its no good. He is not one of the builders so really certain can he only be when he actually has listened to it. The LM3886 isn't the salvation to the world but for some (rather many actually) is this the entrance into the DIY world. Let's not look down on those people that find the LM3875/3886 to be a rather good amp.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
If you wanna make a statement you´ll have to explain. You can´t just say "the chip can´t handle modern speakers". And you also can´t assume that everybody reads your posts and concludes what you might mean with what you say. (Now , how arrogant would that be?) And it is indeed misleading to newbies (for example) to say that. That a appropriate PSU is needed is rather trivial and depends on the amp. Quote:
and used high capacitance from that point on BTW (except in biamp-setups). Quote:
The whole amplifier topology is integrated.
__________________
jens |
|||
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US, New Jersey
|
I was wondering if there is anything you Chip amplifiers people know
that I don't... I built my first chip amplifier several years ago with a 3875.... I found nothing special about this amplifier and I didn't find anything even more special about the subsquent ones I also built, the 3886 and recently the 4780.... The supplies were heafty but nothing major happened, the quality of the sound is so so, nothing even close to true high Fidelity... On the Solid State forum I'm sure I'm learning here and there several things that made a lot of sense to improving the quality of some designs, but here..... So I've been curious why a lot of people swears by these designs which are basically the same and based on the National's scematic. Cost may be? I'm asking because I would like to learn what moves you guys, if anything.....
__________________
JLH 2005, Cyrus and so on... |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
buying stock of chipamp components = $100 investigating permutation/combinations of low-parts-count amps = 100 hours claiming to be an amp designer = priceless [end commercial]
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where the rain does fall but the trees grow tall
|
Quote:
The standard answer is something like this: "Some implementations (DIY or most commercial) using high capacitance standard supplies (non-regulated) produce non exciting sound. A well implemented chipamp using low capacitance supply (arguably creating some limits) or using a regulated supply can sound very very good indeed." Depending on your tastes your mileage may vary, but the notion in this forum is that the results can be very, very good and people build them seeking that "magic" sound usually find it. Some don't of course and continue to seek nirvana elsewhere. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12336 seconds (80.57% PHP - 19.43% MySQL) with 11 queries |