Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st December 2004, 12:30 PM   #1
uli is offline uli  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
Default DC servo

Peranders:

Did you ever try to hear a possible difference in 'sound' in your SMD GC with or without this DC servo?
Many people claim this difference. As I always try to avoid caps in the signal path and thus use servos when I need a dc free environment, I am not sure anymore about my own 'objective' hearing.

Uli



PS: even my phono stage is completely dc coupled.
__________________

'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2004, 12:37 PM   #2
Roushon is offline Roushon  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mumbai (Bombay)
this is a very good point raised. i will also be interested in seeing a discussion on it as i am going to build my GC ( parallel of two inverted LM3886 with separate buffer). many people suggested me not to use the dc-servo.
__________________
S. Roushon
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2004, 12:40 PM   #3
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
No, I haven't tested it yet. But as you know my DC servo is in world's class using a AD8620, not like LM324 or uA741 exactly.

I'm pretty sure that many of those "bad" DC servos are made of not very high classy opamps. The servo is an integrated part in the audio chain so it must be good, at least up to 1 kHz.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2004, 12:46 PM   #4
uli is offline uli  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
Default experiences

up to this point my experiences with dc servos are just good ones. the only issue is the costs of the extra parts and the design, which in fact isnt really an issue. I started like many Europeans with that famous hi end preamp from "Elektor" in the late 80ies. Soon I swapped the outputcaps as there is a servo circuit in the phonostage already. I copied this circuit to the output opamps (old PMI OP27 better than BB) and the performance gain was enormous!
Recently I designed some kind of balanced opamp with diff in and diff out. This circuit although well sounding is very difficult to control without servo. During tweaking people often loose their objective standards and exactly this is my problem. Now Im seeking for other opinions.

Uli

__________________

'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st December 2004, 12:50 PM   #5
uli is offline uli  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
Default Op177 or AD8551

Quote:
Originally posted by peranders
No, I haven't tested it yet. But as you know my DC servo is in world's class using a AD8620, not like LM324 or uA741 exactly.

I'm pretty sure that many of those "bad" DC servos are made of not very high classy opamps. The servo is an integrated part in the audio chain so it must be good, at least up to 1 kHz.

Youre right.

I use OP177 and MKP in the servo because I have some dozens of them although the AD8551 has better dc characteristics.

Ive seen servos with LF353 and elkos. It is very clear (at least for me) that such a circuit wont contribute anything good to the result

Uli

__________________

'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2004, 05:31 AM   #6
Roushon is offline Roushon  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mumbai (Bombay)
Default LF412

what is your opinion about using LF412 as servo as in AN-1192? though i have got some AD8620. I am just curious.

thanks
__________________
S. Roushon
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2004, 06:12 AM   #7
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
 
peranders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
LF412 is like a Volvo, not a Mercedes or BMW. I think it's OK.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2004, 06:28 AM   #8
Roushon is offline Roushon  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mumbai (Bombay)
__________________
S. Roushon
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2004, 07:07 AM   #9
uli is offline uli  Austria
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vienna, Austria
Default Re: LF412

Quote:
Originally posted by Roushon
what is your opinion about using LF412 as servo as in AN-1192? though i have got some AD8620. I am just curious.

thanks
there are many possibilities to implement a dc-servo. One is to simply (?!) make an integrator in the feedback loop as often seen in manufacturers applications. You can add a RC combo at the output of this integrator to achieve a steeper curve. This has some advantages. The servo itself influences the audio circuit not as 'dramatical' as the standard integrator and thus you can use a broader range of devices. The drawback is the quality of the cap used in this RC combo. It should be of reasonable quality.


Personnally I wouldn't quote the 412 as a Volvo - more like a Skoda or Fiat, hoping that this PERSONAL opinion does not lead to another flame war about car quality!


Uli

__________________

'Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny' F.Zappa
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2004, 06:40 AM   #10
Roushon is offline Roushon  India
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mumbai (Bombay)
Hi Uli,
Thank you very much for your details explanation. As far as Audio electronics is concerned I am a newcomer. I am learning reading different threads, so details logical explanation helps a lot. I have one question. In the circuit design of LM3886 (or any such amplifier circuit) how is the offset voltage generated? Is it because of the chip or the choice and quality of the outside components. I mean would a better design (other than the circuit in the datasheet) around LM3886 without using any other op-amp will help to get rid of the offset voltage? I came to know T-network help to a certain extent. May be it is not a question at all, but please let me know...

With best regards.
__________________
S. Roushon
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Servo add-on PCB Nicks Chip Amps 3 21st February 2006 06:36 AM
Has anyone tried servo-less BPA 200? goldyrathore Chip Amps 5 3rd April 2005 08:10 PM
To servo or not to Servo.. ReSiStAnCe Chip Amps 10 7th February 2004 02:06 AM
DC servo Bensen Solid State 0 23rd May 2003 12:34 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM.

Page generated in 0.12316 seconds (83.71% PHP - 16.29% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio