Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th November 2004, 07:58 AM   #1
D_GR8_1 is offline D_GR8_1  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
D_GR8_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Default CarlosFM's Buffer. Is it correct?

Hi,

I created a schematic according to the information in this post:
High-end preamp for my GC

Below is the attached schematic.

Is this correct?

Carlos, can you shed some light on this?
Attached Images
File Type: png buffer.png (41.1 KB, 1192 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 03:00 PM   #2
pete.a is offline pete.a  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
pete.a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nottingham
Default Footnote

Hi,

Yes this is correct, just as Carlos stated later in his post's on this circuit. It's taken from the application footnotes from Nat Semi's web site..

Iv'e built the heaphone amp and it works fine , albeit with some minor fault's. But thats down to my circiut layout..it's got a small hummmm, apart from that im pleased with it.

Try Pavel Macura site...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 06:23 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Default Re: CarlosFM's Buffer. Is it correct?

Quote:
Originally posted by D_GR8_1
Carlos, can you shed some light on this?
Me?
Oh.

C2, C4, C7 and C9 should be 100nf poly or ceramic, not 1uf.
Also, you need a cap between pins 2 and 6 of the OPA627.
200pf is fine, but you can test lower values, like 100pf, it also works fine.
Avoid ceramics here.
An importand thing is that all the PSU bypass caps (100uf+100nf) should be on each chip's PSU pins to ground.
You can also use a 100~330nf poly cap from - to + PSU pins on the OPA627, under the circuit.
It is very important that the layout is as small/tight as possible.
No big feedback loop, no PSU bypass caps far from the chip's PSU pins.

If you stricktly follow these instructions you will have a gorgeous sound.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 10:17 PM   #4
D_GR8_1 is offline D_GR8_1  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
D_GR8_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Default improved it

Carlos,

I followed you suggestions and improved the schematic.

You mention to use a poly cap between - and + pins. Should it be polarized or non-polarized?

About the track length and distance, I will try and implement that onto the PCB design.

I will post the PCB here in the next few days.

Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: png buffer_2.png (42.9 KB, 795 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 10:20 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Swedish Chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stockholm
The day you find a polarized poly cap you have indeed found a very exotic "audio grade" cap...
__________________
"Knowing what to do but not why is no use in a changing world" - The Art of Sound Reproduction
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 10:30 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Default Re: improved it

Quote:
Originally posted by D_GR8_1
You mention to use a poly cap between - and + pins. Should it be polarized or non-polarized?
Are you sure you wanna do this?

Quote:
Originally posted by Swedish Chef
The day you find a polarized poly cap you have indeed found a very exotic "audio grade" cap...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 10:54 PM   #7
D_GR8_1 is offline D_GR8_1  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
D_GR8_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
Default Doh

Doh, when you mentioned poly I associated it with electrolytic.

Too early in the morning for me. I need coffee...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 11:32 PM   #8
shusha is offline shusha  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
shusha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Velika Gorica
Send a message via ICQ to shusha
Default Re: Re: CarlosFM's Buffer. Is it correct?

Quote:
Originally posted by carlosfm

C2, C4, C7 and C9 should be 100nf poly or ceramic, not 1uf.
You mean C2,C4,C3 and C5. Right?

Shusha
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2004, 11:35 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Default Re: Re: Re: CarlosFM's Buffer. Is it correct?

Quote:
Originally posted by shusha
You mean C2,C4,C3 and C5. Right?
Shusha
No.
I meant what I meant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th November 2004, 01:25 AM   #10
KT is offline KT  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
If I wanted to make an integrated preamp/GC in one chassis, I wouldn't need the BUF634T, right? Would I just leave off the BUF stage, or does the OPA627 need an output resistor as well?

Would this be the way to go or does the circuit sound better with the BUF behind the OPA?

Thanks,
KT
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carlosfm's Regulated PSU for GC 300_baud Solid State 21 19th April 2009 05:55 PM
Ps Carlosfm Green Marlin Power Supplies 1 13th December 2008 02:54 PM
Who had kidnapped CarlosFM? Nuuk The Lounge 36 6th May 2005 10:42 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.10571 seconds (75.18% PHP - 24.82% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio