|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It seems like this subject became pretty popular recently.
The easiest way would be using DRV134, however, I was thinking about something more challenging and less usual. Combining some schematics I've seen previously (basicaly Pass balanced GC and Borberly preamps), I came up with this. Would it work well in that application? There is also a possibility of using regular op amps for conversion, and I will post some examples later.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Seems like the subject is challenging indeed, as I only received one comment so far (by e-mail), mixed advice though, and I'm not sure if I could even consider it, especially when it was trying to correct Mr. Borberly's choices. I'm sure more e-mails will come.
![]() In a meantime, we move to ICs, as they are always safer to play with. This is my vision of pretty good, op amp preamp. It is in fact based on an actual, very well sounding preamp design, so no funny e-mails this time please. I guess, for bridging purposes, the circuit could be used without input buffer (gain stage), but if somebody plans to add volume control, the buffer may be actually preferred. I'm using here OPA627, and it sounds not bad. The phase splitting is done using OPA2604, and in this position they also sound fine, but Carlosfm suggested recently AD815 and I wouldn't mind trying those here, especially when they are described as balanced line drivers. The two 1k resistors in series, between two op amps, were used like that on purpose and one can add another gain stage for truely balanced preamp operation at the point between them. There is also a switch allowing to change the gain setting.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Hi Peter,
You have a switch on the input buffer for 3x and 7x gain? 7x gain seams a little high... As for the AD815, it seams to only be available in SMD version, and it needs a heatsink. It's not so easy to use this chip, although... it pays. Sonically I prefer the LM6172 or OPA2132 to the OPA2604. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Those values can be always played with, whatever preference. My preamp actualy is using those exact values and the gain isn't too high.
I also got some samples of SMD AD815 and I'm quite curious about its sound. After all we usually agree on sonic signatures of various chips. ![]() So far I didn't replace OPA2604 yet, but might do it one day. For gain setting it's probably advisable to be adding resistor in parallel with 1K (instead of switching resistors), so there woudn't be any switching noise.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
This is a very good pre too.
Op-amp? Just an LM6172.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
![]() Or wouldn't that quite fit the "challenging and less usual" qualification? se |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I've heard good things about LM6172 so it is on my list of chips to try.
As to the transformer, well that is probably most elegant approach, yet not everybody wants to go with it. I'm considering here a simple circuit to add to the LM4780 board and convert it into bridged amp, as many people asked about it. Transformer, apart form the size restrictions, will not always fit in everybody's budget. Also, if somebody already has the balanced preamp, they don't really need anything extra and can drive two separate channels in a bridged mode, isn't it? This creates also another possibility; instead of adding a bridging board inside the amp, one might build a balanced output preamp and drive stereo amp in a bridged mode. I might go for that myself, actually.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, ok. I'll put the pom-poms away now. ![]() se |
||||
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Pedja
|
||
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| single-ended to differential? | gentlevoice | Digital Line Level | 16 | 17th December 2008 07:18 AM |
| testing a single ended or differential topology | Stefanoo | Pass Labs | 11 | 26th October 2007 06:59 PM |
| Converting from single ended parafeed to differential | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 12th July 2007 07:46 PM |
| Volume control + Single Ended -> Differential Amp | koolscooby | Solid State | 2 | 6th April 2004 12:50 AM |
| Differential to single ended... | Bas Horneman | Tubes / Valves | 21 | 2nd April 2003 03:05 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.21600389 seconds (85.89% PHP - 14.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |