|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wherever I hang my hat...
|
Quote:
Waay off topic, arn't we? Carlos, do you think bypassing with a ceramic here is better than with a film cap? On my dual bench supply I have just thrown away the 1uF tantalums and fitted 47uF electrolytics bypassed with 470nF MKT. Would 100nF ceramic be good here instead? (And it doesn't take up too much more space, if the bypass cap is under the board.)
__________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Just my .02
I try to avoid ceramics in audio gear as much as possible..*Especialy* in the signal path.. But,PSU bypassing with them might not be so bad.. I dislike tantalums,except as power supply bypassing in digital circuits,they perform well there aslong as you overspec the voltage 2-3x! I've had 16V tantalums explode at 12V...25V caps were okay though (35V would be safer.) I dunno why tantalums are so picky about the voltage thing. |
|
|
|
#83 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
Quote:
You can do that across the CAdj. cap. But the cap at the reg's output, in the case of the LM338 (with LM chips) is the most important, as it has influence on the sound of the whole amp. Here I use Philips 47nf MKT caps (polyester) with excellent results. Feel free to use polypropilene if you want. |
||
|
|
|
#84 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Ok.
So, why does the software complain that the ADJ pin has no "driving source" when there is a capacitor connected between it and ground? |
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North of Toronto
|
Carlos : did you ever check the voltage regulation dynamically under heavy load.
Using the snubbers and large caps? What voltage sag percentage did you get?
__________________
Sheldon D |
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
The tests were made with an LM4870 and a weak PSU, made with two 15V/3A trafos, MUR860s and, initially, 3,300uf caps on the PSU, as you can see on the first post of this thread. The LM4780 has 100uf+100nf on board. This PSU, under load, produced around 22.5V, and with music playin' LOUD it sagged to around 18~18.5V. I know, this PSU was just for test purposes, it's weak, and I don't listen to choral music. Inserting 10,000uf caps the PSU voltage under load decreased some 0,5 volts, to around 22V. But with LOUD music it very rarely went below 20V. Better trafos should be used, this was a test. Anyway, I prefered the sound of the final PSU (with the big caps added and the snubbers) to the initial low capacitance PSU. |
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
|
my schematic is exactly the same as the one you posted here on the forum.
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney
|
Considering that Protel licenses cost around $10k, i think i will be making myself quite a profit!
if only my company allowed it... |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09941 seconds (79.97% PHP - 20.03% MySQL) with 11 queries |