Are two separate lm3886 = 2*lm3886 in parallel or bridge mode - diyAudio
 Are two separate lm3886 = 2*lm3886 in parallel or bridge mode
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 19th October 2004, 11:32 AM #1 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bangalore Are two separate lm3886 = 2*lm3886 in parallel or bridge mode I had a basic doubt. If I drive 2 drivers capable of delivering 60W each, separately with 2 separate lm3886 based amps then is it equal to driving one driver delivering 120W using 2 lm3886 in parallel or bridge mode? I hope my question is clear
 19th October 2004, 12:57 PM #2 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: where the Appalachians rise from the Blue Grass The National Semi application note found here: http://www.national.com/an/AN/AN-1192.pdf provides examples of bridge and parallel solutions. Generally speaking, In a bridged amp each LM3886 would see 1/2 the impedance. The bridged amp would consume 4 times the power AND have to disipate the excess as heat. Better heatsinking is required. In a parallel amp each LM3886 would see the total impedance. The parallel amp would provide twice the drive current. The chips in a parallel amp share the heat load, so less heatsinking is required. Each of the above has +'s and -'s. Relative to one amp, one chip It is all in the app note-and more! Take a look. __________________ ...call me Ed...Special Ed... EnABL kit http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-meet/119852-enabl-kit.html DCB1 parts http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-...ml#post2361098
 19th October 2004, 03:05 PM #3 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bangalore Still unclear Thanks bg, I am clear about bridged and parallel mode conneions.But what I wanted to know is if I connect 2 drivers in same box using 2 diff lm3886 chips then the sum total of power equals say roughly 100W is this power euquivalent to 100 watts obtained by bridged or parallel connection. thanks
 19th October 2004, 03:24 PM #4 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: where the Appalachians rise from the Blue Grass yes, but rs1026, 100W=100W under the same test conditions, but with the same power supply you would get different watts from bridge, parallel or discrete amps. It depends on the amp configuration. Using a different amp configuration changes the test condition, so you would obtain a different wattage. On the other side you can see that parallel speakers would have half the resistance, therefore the wattage increases (maybe doubles) to the ability of the amp. I hope this helps __________________ ...call me Ed...Special Ed... EnABL kit http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-meet/119852-enabl-kit.html DCB1 parts http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/swap-...ml#post2361098
 19th October 2004, 05:24 PM #5 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Left Coast In bridge mode where each one sees 1/2 full speaker impedance, you will get increased disdortion. In general with BJT's lower impedance means higer distortion. Going from 8 ohms to 4 ohms can often double the THD figure. Whether you feel this is a problem or not depends on what you think a reasonable THD figure is. In parrallel mode where the impedance is not affected, this is a non-issue. I can't say one is better or not, but you should be aware of it when making your own decision.
 19th October 2004, 07:46 PM #6 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In a dream... Please don't wake me. Hi rs- "2 drivers in same box using 2 diff lm3886 chips " = ~ 60 watts x 2 channels. 60 watts per driver. Sum power from box to drivers =~ 120 watts. Parallel or bridge the 2 LM3886 chips and get either more current or more voltage respectfully. __________________ Troy Thinking positive doesn't make things better, it makes you a better person.
 19th October 2004, 08:48 PM #7 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Left Coast Check the loudspeaker forum regarding two drivers in the same box. There may be some issues regarding lobing, imaging etc. Speaker design is much more esoteric and obscure than mere amplifiers!
 19th October 2004, 09:26 PM #8 Banned   Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Lisbon, Portugal I understand RS1026's question. His doubt is, for instance, if an amp with five channels, 100w each can be considered a 500w amp. No. It's a 5x100w amp. Less serious manufacturers would put a sticker saying something like "500 watts amp", or even worse, 10,000 watts PMPO. RS1026's doubt is if it's better to bi-amp or to single-amp with double the power. It depends on the amp and the speaker. If you were going to buy commercial products you could test one way or the other and decide what works best with a particular speaker. In diy you make it and test it. Anyway, talking in paralleling chips (doublig the current, usually more important than getting more power), it's easy to make a 4-channel amp (with single RCA input) and test it in bi-amp mode or parallel. Use resistors in series with each chip's output, as recommended, and then to parallel is just a question of inserting a wire link between the speaker's binding posts on the amp. Easy.
 20th October 2004, 05:23 AM #9 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bangalore Thanks guys Thanks guys, carlos got my question right Other inputs were also helpful.
 20th October 2004, 10:11 AM #10 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: malaysia dear all If I have an 8 ohm speaker (let assume a true 8 ohm) it is better for me to have 2 chip in parallel config rather then to bridge ?. Reason = double the current but remain the power ?. Thanks

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post geekysuavo Chip Amps 1 13th April 2009 02:43 AM Travis Clarke Chip Amps 9 1st November 2006 04:13 PM john_lenfr Chip Amps 13 4th July 2005 01:27 PM Tim__x Chip Amps 6 23rd June 2004 05:32 PM Toucan Solid State 2 15th March 2003 11:46 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 PM.