Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22nd August 2004, 06:05 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Berkeley, California
Default digital pot for bass/treble/balance cntrl

Has anyone used a digital pot for bass/treble/balance control? If so, do you have any recommendations? Thanks,

Doovieman
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2004, 02:15 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
Default Re: digital pot for bass/treble/balance cntrl

Quote:
Originally posted by Doovieman
Has anyone used a digital pot for bass/treble/balance control? If so, do you have any recommendations? Thanks,

Doovieman
Lots of choices -- Analog Devices, Dallas Semiconductor (now owned by Maxim), National Semiconductor, TI, Microchip Technology, etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2004, 06:40 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Berkeley, California
Yes, I know that there are several companies that manufacture digital pots. My question is if anyone has any recommendations of specific parts. I requested samples of AD5231. I realize that 10 bit resolution is a little extreme, but I want non-volatile memory, SPI interface, and single channel. Either way, I'll write my firmware such that there are much fewer than 1024 steps... Any suggestions? Thanks,

Doovieman

ps Data sheet: http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...70AD5231_a.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2004, 01:23 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
the Nat Semi and TI devices use logarithmic steps but are not of the non-volatile variety. In particular, the PGA2311 is probably the lowest distortion (0.0002%) digital pot available.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2004, 07:23 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Berkeley, California
Thanks for that link...those are some very nice specs. I wish it opperated on +3.3V, but oh well. Thanks for the info.

Doovieman
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2004, 07:43 AM   #6
goering is offline goering  United States
diyAudio Member
 
goering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Carson
Dallas has a digipot that can be used with push button controls instead of a microcontroller.

Here's the link:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/606

Can the PGA2310 or 2311 be used the same way? Could anyone describe how?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2004, 12:18 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
it isn't difficult with discrete devices, but it's much, much easier with a micro-controller. the timing diagram is (of course) right there

You need a clock pulse string, a counter (which sends the 8-bit pot setting) and a flip-flop for the chip-enable. Right and Left settings are sent in one 16 bit packet so you have to stop the clock (but not bring the Chip Select high) to send the 8-bits of LEFT potentiometer settings.
Well, you actually could use two counters, if you want the RIGHT and LEFT to be the same you save the first setting in in one, then spill it out.

There are any number of micro-controller kits out there -- Basic Stamps (www.parallax.com), BX-24 www.basicx.com, Rabbits, Atoms, OOPICs etc. -- most program in easy to learn high-level languages. I started using the Stamp eons ago and now program PICs. The Stamp has a real easy to use "de******" which allows you to correct problems on the fly. (Note -- the web nanny will not allow you to use the technical term -- ergo hoc the asterix -- for catching errors in real time, has something to do with their fear of scatological terms.)

or get the Dallas semi chip (now Maxim)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2004, 02:25 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
audiosteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Niwot, CO
Just an FYI; I've used the Cirrus CS3310 and think it sounds great. I did an AB test between it and my high end Tandberg pre-amp and the 3310 sounded cleaner to me. In the interest of full disclosure I should point out that I work for Cirrus BUT I used the CS3310 long before I became a Cirrus employee.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2004, 04:26 AM   #9
drdagor is offline drdagor  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Dallas Max just sent me info on their MAX5457

Dunno if the part is exactly what I need but theirerature had some interesting ideas in it.

Basic part is a pair of digital volume controls with up down and balance inputs built into a package. Has audio taper. Claims low noise and distortion, but then again, doesn't everybody?

Hope this helps.
__________________
Dr. Dagor
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
replacing treble/bass cut pot rostmann Parts 1 10th August 2008 08:58 AM
nominal bass and treble peace brainerd Solid State 5 21st November 2005 12:41 AM
No bass / No Treble But Bass And treble Help! jleaman Analog Line Level 11 29th October 2005 06:45 AM
GC optimized for Bass, mid, or treble akunec Chip Amps 4 15th November 2004 09:01 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.09636 seconds (78.57% PHP - 21.43% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio