|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all
I'm going to choose one chip amp of LM4766,LM3886,TDA7294 or TDA1514 for my personal Hi-Fi center, which sounds best? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
why do no one answer me?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
There is probably no uniform answer to this question. It very much depends on the way these chips are implemented. I dought it that someone here would ever have compared them.
The one real answer is to try them all and listen. ![]() /Hugo |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
LM3875. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
based on what i hear, the LM 3886 would be a solid choise, and i hope i'm correct as im ordering them as i write this post..
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I can't understand that ....as to the parameter in the Datasheet ,LM3886 is better than LM3875 but the SNR,why many peple think LM3875 is the better choice?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
Some people prefer the sound of tubes and the parameters of those amps are nowhere near the ones of SS. I think it's just easier to work with LM3875 compared to lm3886, because it has less pins to work with and I like P2P. Sound: you have to decide for yourself. Configuration, schematic, parts, preamps, speakers..... To me, the less parts in the way of the signal the better (combined with a sensible circuit design, of course), because all components have their sonic characteristics, so less time spent on tweaking (less places one can screw-up the signal) and more time for listening to music. Build them and tell us what you think. /Greg |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
if you stick with power opamps that are 'known' to be good, it's more a matter of choice...
Do you want to match them with your (theoretically speaking) hard-to-drive loudspeakers or do you have a fantastically easy to drive, super high sensitivity horn system? here's a thread that lists the most used power opamps in commercial products. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok
|
It's also based on mute mode. If you need mute mode for your power amp, I suggest you use LM3886, LM4780 and TDA7294 for your amp. For me, LM3875 and OPA549! very good!
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I prefer to use lm4766 because it's easy to buy,and some people say it sounds like a tube amp, I'm interesting with it.
but I wonder ...as a newer type of NS 'overtrue' amp series, why fewer people have uesd it? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best possible sound quality from +12 ATX PSU | Arnop | Chip Amps | 3 | 6th April 2009 12:40 PM |
| CSS FR125S Sound Quality | the full ranger | Full Range | 2 | 11th December 2007 09:45 PM |
| Better Sound Quality | LqDFx | Car Audio | 14 | 16th June 2006 05:49 PM |
| Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? | KT | Class D | 0 | 14th November 2004 07:51 AM |
| TAD sound quality | Kal | Multi-Way | 12 | 6th April 2004 07:16 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10592 seconds (78.60% PHP - 21.40% MySQL) with 10 queries |