Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th July 2004, 12:25 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta Georgia Area
Default Offset servos needed?

I am working up the design of an amp thats going to be switchable between bridge/parallel mono and stereo/parallel operation. The AN-1192 bulletin(BPA-200 example) suggests using servos (an integrator)to cancel dc offset.
My question is would it be equally good to put in a precision trimmers and hand trim each output? or does it need to be actively compensated for?
Any help would be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2004, 01:53 AM   #2
memorex is offline memorex  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby, bc or london, on
I built that circuit. I just used a multimeter and used resistors within +-.1% tolerance and had perfect results. Servos are overkill.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2004, 01:53 PM   #3
diyAudio Moderator
 
JojoD818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: diyAudio Special Operations Center
Overkill, I agree.

Just try to match resistors as close as possible and your fine.

JojoD
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2004, 02:23 PM   #4
bobolix is offline bobolix  Czech Republic
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Prague
Trimming and selecting yields a "true DC". DC servo supresses transfer below certain frequency (although it can be low enough) and the complete circuit can have quite long settling time (e.g. after switch-on). But, I don't assume the DC servo to be an overkill - I use it, if the trimming needs to be avoided.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2004, 09:09 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta Georgia Area
Default Thanx for the responses

Thank you for the responses. I do not understand this response however.

bobolix wrote:
Trimming and selecting yields a "true DC". DC servo supresses transfer below certain frequency

Does this mean the servo will act as a high pass filter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2004, 09:50 PM   #6
johnnyx is offline johnnyx  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: manchester
Default Re: Thanx for the responses

Quote:
Originally posted by Tsanford
Does this mean the servo will act as a high pass filter?
Yes.
DC should really be called Zero Frequency in this case, because that is what is meant. So the amp will have no gain at zero frequency, it will be attenuated by the servo loop, yet it must have gain at audio frequencies to hear the output. The frequency of transition between the two is determined by the CR network in the servo, usually the servo amp is wired as an integrator or single pole filter.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Improving DC-servos Elvee Solid State 22 16th September 2008 11:04 AM
cascaded servos Onvinyl Solid State 0 6th June 2008 05:36 PM
Zapfilter DC offset trouble, help needed Sarman Digital Source 35 12th February 2007 08:15 PM
Help needed: odd DC offset on UCD400. maxlorenz Class D 16 8th September 2006 05:08 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM.

Page generated in 0.07953 seconds (68.26% PHP - 31.74% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio