Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd July 2004, 10:57 PM   #51
cjd is offline cjd  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Windy City
For the LM3886, I think this slight tweak will allow parallel circuits with as many as you choose. I believe you'll want to leave R2 off the boards and use just one at input (?) - same with the cap at input for parallel circuits. Output can come straight off the pin or through a resistor hence the dual O+ options. I have seen some suggestions that this R be used on a single board anyhow. I'm not sure whether trying to put two chips on a single board for a parallel circuit outweighs the potential to just stack as many single chip boards as you want/need.

I moved Rfb back outside the pins of the chip in case pin7 should go to the power ground directly not signal ground. If not it leaves some room to open up the schematic and insert the mute circuitry...

As for time, trust that you aren't causing me to miss anything at all. My mother in law is in town (out shopping with my wife) and it's pouring rain down.

Click the image to open in full size.

I think I need to work on a better bypassing scheme... any suggestions would be helpful.

C
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2004, 07:09 PM   #52
Pedja is offline Pedja  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
C,

Yes, it seems it widened somehow… No need to move PSU caps to make a space for the speaker ground, just take that from the caps central point and make a track of few cm so you can make another pad. Bypass caps can be mounted beneath the board, though with 100u or smaller caps necessity for them becomes lesser.

I think the layout is generally very good and I think it is now most important to determine the definitive size of the parts.

Yes, the discrete (non-f/b) reg is IMO better. I have, however, two reasons not to deal with it at the moment. The first is that we may get better if doing one thing at the time, and the second is that after some late cases here I am reluctant to do some things publicly.

Pedja
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 02:01 PM   #53
Rick NL is offline Rick NL  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gouda
Default Removed bridge wire

Hoe about this connection between Power ground and Signal ground?
Rick
Attached Images
File Type: gif lm3886_forrpsv3rr.gif (5.9 KB, 345 views)
__________________
After all it's the music
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 02:55 PM   #54
...truth seeker...
diyAudio Member
 
Ed LaFontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: where the Appalachians rise from the Blue Grass
Default GC input buffer

I apologize to all those who have contributed to development of the GC buffer for my mention of lm3886 taking us "off track". Pedja is right. We are better when we do just one thing at a time. I also wish I could do something for Pedja's concern #2. Thank You Pedja, however I'm afraid my gratitude won't alleviate issues brought on by others.
Sincerely,
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 03:19 PM   #55
troystg is online now troystg  United States
diyAudio Member
 
troystg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lousy Anna
Default Request to move to a new thread.

Hello Moderators-

May I ask you to move the following posts to a new thread in the Chip Amp forum in a title similar to "Parallel LM3886 amp"? They seem to hijacked this thread, and for this I apologize.

1. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...419#post429419

2. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...434#post429434

3. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...900#post429900

4. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...932#post429932

5. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...975#post429975

6. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...424#post431424


edit: Include this post to please!

Thank you in advance,

Troy
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 03:35 PM   #56
Rick NL is offline Rick NL  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gouda
Default Please move this one too

Hi, I was too quick in my reply to the HiJacked post of CJD as he already mentioned the track possibility in his text.
Now i studied the PCB and text better I see taht the space can be used for the additional PosPower pin No.5. Although fron the NS data sheet you could read that it is not abolutly required, it is always the best to use all available Power pins.
More serious might be that the mute resistor is not on the PCB, This is in fact an unmute resistor and without it there will be no music from the chip.
Use 39k and it will supply the min 0.5 mA from a power supply of 22 V DC upwards. The capacitor is for delay but also decoupling. Probably 10 uF or more is OK when no delay is required, else 100uF or more might be OK.

Rick
Attached Images
File Type: gif lm3886_forrpsv4rr.gif (6.8 KB, 329 views)
__________________
After all it's the music
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 03:48 PM   #57
Pedja is offline Pedja  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
I personally do not have a problem with LM3886 here, it is in fact about a few needed changes… Its mute pin, as Nick just noted, can be used for power up delay, this spells LM3886 gives the possibility to deal with the buffer’s power up thump by one capacitor.

Though paralleled chips would probably lead us a bit further from where we are now.

Pedja
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 04:37 PM   #58
Pedja is offline Pedja  Serbia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
Quote:
Originally posted by Pedja
(...) as Nick just noted (...)
Too late to edit... Sorry, I've meant Rick.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2004, 09:34 PM   #59
cjd is offline cjd  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Windy City
I've stepped back a bit and am researching parts (to get exact sizes!) In doing this, my lack of experience in this field is becoming rather obvious - I don't know which versions of what to use! So some help here would really be appreciated, and I can keep chugging along on doing these PCB's. Things have been through a couple revisions already (on the chip boards anyhow) since I've posted previously, but I'm waiting to post again till I have part sizes down better.

I've also dug up a couple programs for designing these.

One question I have is this: Should I stick single sided? There are some advantages both ways, but I suspect double-sided wouldn't be something you could go etch yourself? But if it turns into some kind of group-buy, I think things start to get vaguely reasonable at 50 boards for manufactured, double sided with solder masks and silk-screen.

And, I actually don't feel the chip boards are out of place here, since going regulated in particular means much smaller caps at the chip. So it's a package thing in my mind. I'm looking at ways of putting this all on a single PCB so that it can be left as one piece or broken up. I'm also trying to make the amp boards in such a way that you could turn them "sideways" and run solid core wire through a stack of them to parallel them. I haven't looked at inverted topology yet to see about bridging possibilities.

C
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2004, 12:30 AM   #60
diyAudio Member
 
moving_electron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where the rain does fall but the trees grow tall
Quote:
Originally posted by cjd


One question I have is this: Should I stick single sided?
I guess I would vote for single sided if the layout experts end up happy with the layout from a performance point of view.

My thinking is that folks could try the design sooner as they could more etch it themselves rather than have to wait for a possibly one time group buy. In addition having a version that folks could easily etch allows a lot more flexibility for integrating for example the power supply into an existing gainclone.

If the true target was a group buy though, there is no doubt that professionally manufactured double sided boards are a beautiful thing.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power supply for FIRST WATT B1 BUFFER ANADIGIT Swap Meet 25 22nd May 2009 03:39 PM
Power Supply Regulator for T-Amps DreadPirate Digital Source 0 31st December 2007 03:00 PM
ucd400: Hypex HXR12 Regulators vs. Input buffer auxiliary supply jdec Class D 1 23rd December 2007 06:52 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 PM.

Page generated in 0.13177 seconds (82.17% PHP - 17.83% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio