|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I was looking at the internal cct of an LM3875 today and got to thinking about the fact that the positive supply rail has somewhat better supply rejection than the negative rail. A look at the cct shows that there is a whole pile of things referenced to the neg rail. Some go through current sources at least while others go through just a resistor. This being the case, it is no wonder that the neg rail has more of an influence on the internal goings-on.
Then I thought - how about an amplifier that has the input signal referenced to the neg rail instead of zero volts? Of course it would mean the output would have to be capacitively coupled to the load, but it would also mean that the internal circuitry would have the chance to operate in a more "pure" manner. The neg rail could jump around all it likes, but provided it is connected to the input signal earth it will not function as an unintended "input" to the chip. What do others think? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Or maybe it would help to just do the decoupling "right", but
I suppose you are already familiar with the following app note http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...8865AN-202.pdf |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
Thanks for the link, Christer.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Well, then. I'm going to go ahead with this project even if no-one else is excited about it.
If the tab *is* in fact a direct path to the negative supply connection on the die, then it would have to be the shortest, most direct, lowest inductance path possible. If the tab were bolted and /or soldered to a copper groundplane + heatsink, with a surface mount ceramic cap bypassing the positive rail down to the groundplane right where the lead comes out of the plastic case then we have the possibility of some seriously good earthing. Everyone talks about short feedback paths for getting the best out of a gainclone. I even read somewhere about cutting away part of the plastic case to make the connection shorter still! Seeing the supply rail rejection on the negative rail is only fairly good, then perhaps there is just a little to be gained ( ) by using a similarly meticulous approach to earthing and bypassing. I've decided to go for the bridge approach because I couldn't stomach the idea of an output coupling capacitor. I didn't want to be 'straining out gnats but gulping down camels'. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
protection circuitry with a relay in series with the speaker though. It could be a bit hot for the speaker if one of the amps fail or just decides to do a thermal shutdown or something. Always a good idea to include anyway, I guess, but it seems more necessary here. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Quote:
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Yeah, I did look at the data sheet, but nowhere did it tell me what I really wanted to know, and that is - is the negative supply rail pin a direct connection to the tab???
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Quote:
Might be worth dropping a line to National's tech support then, I might be confusing it with the OPA548/9s
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Aw, come on you blokes! Can't one of you just do a little measurement with their multimeter? Huh? Huh? Huh?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I need a negative supply rail--but how? | wally.gribbles | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 18th February 2008 07:36 PM |
| Full negative rail voltag on my output?? | aletheian | Chip Amps | 1 | 26th October 2005 04:38 AM |
| GC problem: voltage dropout on negative rail | scone | Chip Amps | 6 | 14th January 2005 07:15 AM |
| Strange Power Problem, no negative rail? | Adam M. | Chip Amps | 16 | 15th September 2004 01:27 AM |
| How to regulate a negative rail with TL431? | JoeBob | Solid State | 13 | 4th September 2004 11:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |