|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Wiki | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Community | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
I have some doubts in my mind about the input impedance of a common non-inverting op amp circuit which appears in the data sheet for the LM4780 chip amp, and my research has not revealed a definitive answer.
Here's a couple of simple questions for which I am seeking the correct answer, and why: 1. What is the AC input impedance of the circuit below, for frequencies above the f3 point determined in part by Cin ? 2. What value should RB actually be to balance the DC input offset currents, so that the output DC offset is minimised? Please reply if you know the correct answer. I would prefer not to waste bandwidth with any off-the-top-of-my-head guesses.
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Hi,
your question is about non-inv. opamp but your picture shows inv.amp.........wasting bandwidth? Answers are here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_amplifier Regards |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
DC offset is caused by other things as well as by the PD due to input currents!
But to answer your question, 14K for Rb is about right (20k in parallel with 48k). But frankly, unless your input bias currents are high, I wouldn't have though it will make much difference. But why is this an inverting amp when you call it non-inverting? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
Oh, and your input impedance will be about 980 Ohms in the audio range.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Glenn, first I think you should take a close look at the datasheet of LM4780 and also AN-1192 and also application notes for the LM4780.
The 47 k is totally unnecessary. If you want to do it really right the 953 ohms resistors should be 20 kohms if you want to minimize the offset voltage. This resistor had also a purpose of protection during power down and the recommend value was 1 kohms. The input impedance = Rin => 1 kohms in your case => the input cap is way too small. 10 uF at least should it be. f = 1 /(2*pi*R*C) EDIT: I have checked the datasheet and I see that you have taken the exact circuit as suggested but something is wrong, according to me. Am I wrong?
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Whoops, I actually meant an inverting amp circuit. My apologies.
The wikipedia says Zin = Rin for the inverting amp, as does every other reference I could find. In which case, Cin = 1 uF is indeed way too small for this circuit as audio amplifier: f3 = 1 / ( 2 . pi . C . Rin || Ri ) = 163 Hz (no bass!) (where Rin || Ri = 979 ohms) Also, RB should really be Rf || ( Ri + Rin) = 14118 ohms, rather than the Rf || Ri = 953 ohms given in the circuit. Does anyone think that NS stuffed up these two aspects of this particular app circuit for the LM4780?
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
|
953 Ohms would be correct if you didn't have the input capacitor or course.
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Tube Buffered Gainclone in work |Thread |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
__________________
Glenn. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne
|
Quote:
The resistive load on the input which determines the f3 then becomes Ri alone, ie. f3 = 1 / ( 2 . pi . Ri . C ) It then follows that RB = Rf, as there is now no DC path through Ri. My beef with the inverting circuit is that to have a reasonable input impedance (say >20K) and a resonable gain (say 20) requires Ri = 20K and Rf = 400K. In my mind, 400K is too large for a feedback resistor. The overall noise would be higher and the DC offset input currents would make the DC output offset voltage much higher. Quote:
__________________
Glenn. |
||
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| opamp inverting input sounds better? | dorkus | Solid State | 89 | 24th November 2011 11:53 AM |
| Class D input LM311 Inverting input | zox2003 | Class D | 1 | 1st February 2008 07:48 AM |
| Inverting opamp input resistors calculation (pic) | redrabbit | Parts | 3 | 18th July 2007 09:12 AM |
| Aleph-phase lag with non-inverting input | jupiterjune | Pass Labs | 38 | 21st February 2007 04:05 PM |
| Input impedence of inverting gainclone | PHilgeman | Chip Amps | 1 | 7th January 2004 03:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |