|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
More and more good pcb design has maked.let's make a pcb based gc becomes simple,beautiful and steady.
If us minimize a chip amp,as possible as compact,integrate the PCB,chips,components and heat sink in a block module.all interfaced directly to the pcb.no wire,no distance... this is a mad ideas,I think it can over and over the original GAINCARD's layout projects. first plan please see this link:http://diyaudio.com/forums/showthrea...229#post382229 peter,and all gc gays,please
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cambridge
|
Quote:
I take it you mean guys, not gays here, right? ![]() (I can't even manage to spell 'not' right today) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
good day,bigparsnip.have you any idea for this new threads? kind regards -digi |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
this is a example,SINGLE LM1875 PCB MODULE,sorry for my ugly drawing.by this way,we can remove all link wires.if pcb layout design is very fine even short distance than p2p block mode amps.
btw:Who has pictures of original gaincard inside view? |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cambridge
|
One thing which I have thogut about trying to do with the LM4780 design was to see how much better you could make the PCB using a four layer board. This way, you could have on plane each dedicated to V+, V- and ground, with a whole layer left over for the signal routting. The only thing I have to say against this is that it may cost quite a lot more to get the four layer boards produced (although, I'm sure it could still be done for less than $10, per board for each chip, and the PSU could still be just single sided). Also, this would mean that I realy would have to spend some time learning how to use protel, as the free version of eagle I normaly use will only do two signal layers.
The second thing that I have thought about has kind of already been brought up in the other thread for the LM4780 boards, which is to try and use SMD (some of the large types anyway) components for the non-audio signals on the PCB, such as any possibly mutting circutry that needs to be included. As, this should in theory reduce the cos of those components if it is for a group order, and allow a smaller PCB design as well. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I had the other styles designs of a serise 4780 layout projects, I do not want to repeat this direction... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland, OR
|
Digi,
Please consider the following, but realize I didn't have much time to spend looking at it. What is the advantage of providing big plugs that connect to another "pcb" to distribute V+, V-, gnd and so on? I guess your concept is to plug one board into another, right? I guess this would be great for testing lots of pcb's coming off the assembly line. You could just plug them in, test them and send them on. But I can't see the advantage for our needs. In fact, the placement of the plugs has caused all of the supply and ground lines to be way too long and you're sharing too many connections along the trace leading to ground. I can see the benefit of consolidating everything on one pcb for 2 or 4 channels and it makes sense to me to try and put an rca jack and 2 speaker jacks directly on the pcb, but then you would have serious limits on how to place the unit in a back panel of your box. But I think a small self-contained module like that might be fun anyway. -Robert |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chip based car pre-amp | Banfi T. | Chip Amps | 17 | 5th January 2010 01:52 AM |
| how is the quality of a chip-based volume control VS normal stepped attenuator? | jarthel | Parts | 4 | 16th July 2007 02:40 PM |
| Any ideas to improve this PCM-54K based DAC? | Salar | Digital Source | 5 | 12th July 2007 10:50 AM |
| 555 chip based delay | niiico | Everything Else | 6 | 7th December 2006 09:00 AM |
| High Power Chip-based Amplifier? | deiksac | Chip Amps | 6 | 24th October 2006 12:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09505 seconds (78.02% PHP - 21.98% MySQL) with 11 queries |